The bully has made US bombardment campaigns more secretive, as well as
more deadly. Apparently he thinks the US will escape blame if the
public can't tell what is going on.
Raqqa and Mosul really were war zones, and many soldiers might have
been killed in battle if the US had not given them close air support.
It was impossible to do this without killing civilians sometimes.
However, was it possible to do this while killing fewer civilians?
Denied information, we have no way of knowing. We know only that
we can't rely on the bully to lead the US military to care.
Under Dubya and Obama, the US generally denied causing civilian casualties,
sometimes persisting in the denial despite incontestable proof.
You could even say that they blazed the trail for the bully's
persistent lies.