A descendant of Ponca chief Standing Bear demands that Harvard return
a hatchet that Standing Bear gave away in gratitude.
We know that the US committed many injustices against Standing Bear
and the rest of the Poncas, as it did to many other indigenous
Americans. Only a fraction of them are mentioned in the article.
However, none of that invalidates Standing Bear's gift of the hatchet
to Webster, who had defended his right to be considered human. That
was a valid gift, and so (as far as we know) was Webster's gift of the
hatchet to Harvard. Thus, I conclude that Chapman's argument is
invalid and Harvard should keep the hatchet.
Displaying the hatchet in a museum can teach Americans about what
indigenous Americans had to do to claim human rights in the United
States.