PROJET AUTOBLOG


Richard Stallman's Political Notes

Site original : Richard Stallman's Political Notes

⇐ retour index

Sabotaging the US

lundi 4 février 2019 à 01:00

The bully could sabotage the US in many ways by declaring a state of emergency. He would have many powers that he could use against any target of his choice.

dooH niboR in Brazil

lundi 4 février 2019 à 01:00

Brazil's new president dooH niboR plans to reduce the minimum wage for the poor, and reduce taxes for the rich.

He gets his support, like the numbskull in the US, mainly from people who practice a reversed sect of Christianity: hate thy poor neighbors and obey the powerful.

HR.1

lundi 4 février 2019 à 01:00

The bill HR.1 would fix dozens of cracks and loopholes in US democracy.

I support all of them, except one:

Preventing states from imposing restrictions on voting by mail;
I am concerned that your boss or your spouse might force you to vote by mail, and use that to compel you to vote as perse wants. Many US companies and managers try to tell their staff how to vote, and lying about what you did in the voting booth is your defense, which you would lose if you can vote by mail instead. I don't understand this item:
Affirming Congress’s right to restore the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which granted the Justice Department veto power over jurisdictions with histories of voting discrimination;
It is important to restore the Voting Rights Act, but does this bill do so, or does it only insist that Congress _could_ do so?

It will be hard to pass this bill; Republicans will oppose it. But they may lose the next election due to opposing it.

The First Step Act

lundi 4 février 2019 à 01:00

The First Step Act needs to be followed by more steps. The US imprisons far too many people, and puts many in solitary for years, even subjecting many to physical torture.

DNA testing

lundi 4 février 2019 à 01:00

A woman that has been in a coma in a hospital for a decade had a baby. The search for who raped her might involve taking DNA samples from all the male employees.

15 years ago, if I were not the father of the baby, I would have seen no reason to object to the testing of my DNA. It would have shown I was not the guilty party, and that's all it would have done.

Nowadays, I would be concerned about possible harm that might come to me as a result of having my DNA on file, regardless of why they had taken it.