UK anti-privacy activists
seek
to use the Paris attacks as an excuse to skip debate about new
mass surveillance powers.
Each terrorist attack, anywhere in the world, provides an excuse for
Big Brother to say we should surrender more freedom so he can
"protect" us. Aside from the danger of tyranny, which exceeds that of
terrorists, it's
not
even clear that increased surveillance would achieve its goal.
There is no limit to how many people a tyrannical state can kill,
torture, or imprison. We need a state, for the
many
essential things that states can do, but we must make sure it
remains under our control, and we
can't
do that if it knows everywhere we go and everyone we talk with.
Prohibiting expression of opinions, "advocating" this or that, is a
form of tyranny. When "extremism" is prohibited, will plutocrats
declare rejection of plutocracy "extreme"? We be prosecuted for
advocating a return to democracy?