On cancellation and persecution of authors, and the grip of
cancellationist staff in publishing companies.
The article is long, and it is only after hundreds of lines that we
find Clanchy defend using the terms "chocolate skin" and "almond eyes"
to describe pupils who used those same terms to describe themselves.
Everyone else quoted has no doubt that those are insulting, but they
do not try to justify this, and it seems totally arbitrary to me.
Chocolate is something delicious and much loved — I can't imagine it
as negative. In the 1980s some black MIT students set up a dorm floor
to live together in and called it "Chocolate House". Did they think
they were insulting themselves? I think it was an expression of pride.
My conclusion is that Clanchy did nothing actually wrong; she was the
victim of hypersensitivity, magnified by an ideology that calls for
magnifying any and all hypersensitivity (except when on behalf of
white males).
Mike Pence is a Christian extremist who nonetheless resisted pressure
to join in overthrowing the US government. I disagree with his
politics deeply and broadly, and I would not want to publish a book of
his writing. But it is dangerous if books by people with his views
are generally blocked from publication by people with views more like
mine who work in the publishing industry.