Hungary has passed a law which seems to prohibit showing video
including transgender minors except late at night.
The expression "defend the right of children to an identity that
conforms to their birth gender," when we interpret "right" correctly,
means that no one should try to force or pressure children to be
trans. I agree that children who want to be cis have the right to be cis.
However, I doubt that many children grow up under pressure to be
trans. Few parents are likely to impose such pressure. (The Chinese
movie, "Farewell My Concubine," presents a fictional example that
might be based on some real instances 100 years ago.)
The right-wing advocates of that law seem to twist the concept of
"have the right" by adding, implicitly, "whether they like it or not."
That results in an excuse to impose something on people while
pretending to be respecting their freedom.
People have duties as well as rights. There are times when we must
demand that people carry out their duties — for instance, to pay taxes
so the state can carry out its missions.
But we should reject the dishonesty of pretending that this is done
for the sake of those people, that it constitutes defending their
rights.
It appears that "children" is being used here to mean "minors". I
can't let that practice go by without a rebuke. Treating teenagers
like children harms them by infantilizing them.