The US approved keeping the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant running
10 additional years, from 2025 to 2035.
The article asserts that California is having trouble coming up with
renewable generation to replace the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant,
but also that ten-ish US power reactors have closed since 2013 due to
competition from cheaper renewable generation. It is not easy to
reconcile those two statements.
If California doesn't expect to have enough renewable generation
working by 2025, why doesn't it spend more money on building more
rather than on keeping the Diablo Canyon power plant running?