The mainstream media are starting to recognize that digital "toys" for
children are likely to snoop on them.
They do that as a consequence of containing nonfree software. The
user community can't study and fix the software so it doesn't spy, and
that means the users have no protection except to reject these toys,
separately.
I do not consider any digital functionality to be an "enhancement" of
life it is controlled by someone other than its users.
In union there is strength. If users try to "negotiate" with the companies
by rejecting products, they have little clout and little influence.
The article says that the ROYBI Robot "has a camera and microphone to
detect facial and emotional reactions from kids, but all of the
information collected is controlled through a parent or guardian's
account." I am not sure what "controlled...account" means concretely,
but I tend to think that it is not adequate to protect the child's
privacy.
When will the mainstream media realize that snooping is just as wrong
when carried out against adults?