The genocide of the Armenians was
started
100 years ago.
In Turkey, as in France, it is impossible to speak honestly about this
issue. Under those countries' censorship laws, one must choose
between risking prosecution and parroting the official line. Hrant
Dink,
hero
of freedom of speech, was prepared to defy both countries to
prosecute him for talking about history. If you are in one of those
countries and not prepared to go to that length, I recommend that you
respond to the subject by saying that censorship makes honest
discussion of the question impossible in that country.
Since I am not in Turkey or France, I can speak freely about the
subject. I condemn the genocide of the Armenians.
This does not mean condemnation of Turks or Turkey today. Those who
carried out the genocide of the Armenians are dead. Turkey's duty
today is to confront its past honestly. The Turks and Turkey of today
cannot inherit culpability for a wrong committed 100 years ago, but if
they deny or defend that wrong, they make themselves culpable for it.
Every country with a long history has crimes in that history. Every
country needs to acknowledge these crimes to go forward honestly, and
apologize for them to go forward ethically. To deny national crimes
corrupts the spirit. To ask which country's crime is worse is a
distraction.
The government of Turkey corrupts the national spirit by denying the
genocide of the Armenians. The government of Japan likewise corrupts
the national spirit by denying its past crimes, including
forcing
women into prostitution.
The US has recognized that it stole land from indigenous peoples, and
apologized for imprisoning Japanese-Americans. But Republicans in the
US are actively campaigning to cover up a more recent crime:
Dubya's
lies that were the pretext for the conquest and invasion of Iraq.
Woe to the US if it swallows this lie.