PROJET AUTOBLOG


Free Software Foundation Europe

source: Free Software Foundation Europe

⇐ retour index

SFP#6 Copyright enforcement with Dr. Miriam Ballhausen

vendredi 3 juillet 2020 à 01:00

SFP#6 Copyright enforcement with Dr. Miriam Ballhausen

We invited Dr. Miriam Ballhausen to talk with us about copyright enforcement. She is a German lawyer with the focus on software, data protection, copyright law and specifically Free Software copyright. This is the sixth regular episode of the Software Freedom Podcast for which we invite experts from our community.

In this sixth episode of the Software Freedom Podcast we talk about Free Software copyright enforcement with our guest Dr. Miriam Ballhausen. Dr. Miriam Ballhausen is a German laywer and is specialised in Free Software copyright questions. Together we cover the basics about Free Software licensing and discuss, how Free Software copyright can be enforced, what are the steps to enforce it and why it is often enforced in Germany. We also explore how the REUSE project could help with being in compliance with Free Software licenses.

Read more:

If you liked this episode and want to support our continues work for software freedom, please help us with a donation.

Support FSFE

The public sector of Bühl uses Free Software

mardi 30 juin 2020 à 01:00

The public sector of Bühl uses Free Software

The town of Bühl, Germany, has started the successful Free Software based video conference platform “Palim! Palim!”. To find out more about the relations between Bühl and Free Software we conducted an interview with Eduard Itrich, the digitisation officer from the town of Bühl.

The town of Bühl, in the south-west of Germany, started a video conference platform, called “Palim! Palim!” based on the Free Software “Jitsi Meet” to ease the effects of the COVID-19 lock-down for their citizens. “Palim! Palim!” quickly became a striking success; the citizens were thrilled with it and also other municipalities started to became interested. But “Palim! Palim!” is not the only Free Software project used and maintained by the town of Bühl. To find out more about the background behind “Palim! Palim!” and what other relations the town of Bühl has with Free Software we conducted this interview with the “Chief Digital Officer,” Eduard Itrich, from the public administration of Bühl.

FSFE: Mr. Itrich, can you quickly introduce yourself and the town of Bühl, and explain what a “Digitalisierungsbeauftragter” is?

Eduard Itrich: First of all I would like to thank you very much for this interview. I have been following the work of FSFE e.V. for many years now and I am all the more thankful for the opportunity to talk to you directly. My name is Eduard Itrich, I am 31 years old and after my studies of mathematics I first worked as a Linux software developer. As you can see, Free Software has always been an integral part of my profession. After my two-year parental leave to look after my two twin daughters, I started working for the town of Bühl as a "digitisation officer" at the end of last year. Characteristic of the town of Bühl is its diversity. Located in the south-west of Germany between the Rhine plain, vineyards and the Black Forest, the large district town with almost 30,000 inhabitants offers numerous criteria that make the community liveable and lovable. An extremely diverse range of associations, excellent childcare facilities, an active community of retailers, lively church communities and very committed citizens speak for the quality of life on site, as do the town's measures in urban development, climate protection and, of course, digitisation.

Perhaps the position of digitisation officer is more familiar to some under the title of "Chief Digital Officer". Essentially, it is about consolidating a digitisation strategy and orchestrating the digital transformation both within and outside the town administration. I deal with topics such as eGovernment and Smart City, as well as Open Data, and within the town hall of course also with the automation of existing administrative processes.

You recently introduced a video platform “Palim! Palim!” - can you explain the use case and what “Palim! Palim!” exactly is?

We have developed an open video conferencing platform, based on the Free Software “Jitsi Meet”, called “Palim! Palim!”. This offers video telephony to all Bühl citizens at no charge and, of course, beyond the town limits. We support families, groups of friends, associations, initiatives, and also companies in their efforts to be able to meet digitally in an uncomplicated and low-threshold manner. It does not require more than an up-to-date browser to stay in touch. No need to register or collect sensitive metadata. Since the launch of our platform at the beginning of April, we have seen many interesting use cases: for example, the digital children's leisure program for doing handicrafts together or the long-awaited reunion between nursing home residents and their families.

“We have developed an open video conferencing platform, based on the Free Software “Jitsi Meet,” called “Palim! Palim!”. This offers video telephony to all Bühl citizens at no charge and, of course, beyond the town limits.”

How did the idea behind “Palim! Palim!” start?

The idea of a video conferencing platform of our own was originally born out of the desire to continue to offer group lessons at the municipal music school during the Corona pandemic. Due to free capacities we decided in the further course of the project to make the platform available to all citizens. Today, we are very proud to have taken this courageous step and note that some very new discussions about digital sovereignty and services of general interest in the digital age have developed.

Why did you choose Jitsi Meet for “Palim! Palim!”?

The Free Software project "Jitsi Meet" was exactly the software we were looking for. It offers a very easy access for our target group to video conferencing, is easy to administer and the active community quickly finds a solution to any problems that may arise. Furthermore, we had the possibility to customise the software exactly according to our ideas, for example to include the urban design.

What difference does it make if you use Free Software, or not?

Especially the option to customise the software at will gave us the opportunity to create our own individual video conferencing solution for the city. We are convinced that exactly this local reference and the associated trust has contributed significantly to the success of the platform. At the same time, Free Software gives us the opportunity to think about the protection of personal data and the privacy of our users right from the design process. We can make a conscious decision for data economy and against the integration of unnecessary trackers. And last but not least, the very active community of Jitsi Meet was a good support for the implementation of an instance of our own. There was no problem we could not find a solution for in the forums or channels.

"Free Software gives us the opportunity to think about the protection of personal data and the privacy of our users right from the design process."

How was the feedback on “Palim! Palim!” so far?

Amazing! At no time did we expect such a great response. Many citizens express their personal thanks to us and we have stopped counting how many municipalities have approached us with great interest. I believe that Free Software is currently experiencing an incredible boost and that the sensitivity for data sovereignty is growing rapidly.

Are there any other Free Software projects you and your department are working on, or are you contributing to other Free Software projects?

We had been searching for a long time for a simple solution to make the minutes of meetings and discussions available to all participants in a bundled form and to be able to track important tasks. With the Free Software project "4Minitz!" we found a strong candidate that met almost all our requirements. The only catch: the interface was completely in English at that time and there was a risk of insufficient acceptance within the various specialist offices. With a total of more than 11,000 lines of changes to the code base, we initiated the development of internationalisation and localisation. It is very important to us not only to use Free Software, but also to give something back to the community. By now 4Minitz! can be used in 18 different languages.

You also use “decidim”. Could you explain what it is used for?

Our approach to digitisation is not to simply dictate it from the top down without any involvement. We want all employees to be able to express themselves - especially reservations or criticism of new solutions or offers. In the course of this we were looking for a suitable participation platform. Again, we found what we were looking for in a Free Software project. With the "decidim" framework, we were able to very quickly set up an internal participation and suggestion portal that promotes direct exchange within our administration. With "decidim", the digitisation team, which is distributed across all offices, can now easily bundle and discuss ideas and make internal decision-making processes transparent for all employees.

"Again, we found what we were looking for in a Free Software project."

What made you choose “decidim”?

A central component of decidim is the networking of online discussions with analogue meetings on site. This means that we can easily transfer suggestions and ideas into a meeting and present the results of this meeting transparently on the platform. This healthy mix of online and offline formats is, in our opinion, the key to a successful participation platform.

Do you use “decidim” only for internal communication or also for public communication with the citizens?

At present, unfortunately only for internal idea management, but we are firmly planning to provide an open participation platform for all citizens based on decidim.

What are the hurdles and what would need to be improved before you could use “decidim” for public communication with the citizens?

From a technical point of view the framework is great and again a strong community is worth its weight in gold. However, the mainly machine-made translation into German is rather unsuitable for a public operation. But here too, we are currently planning another bold step and are considering a crowdfunding campaign to finance a professional translation. You may remain curious!

Would you encourage other municipalities to also use Free Software?

Absolutely! The additional time required at the beginning of a Free Software based project may be a deterrent. But the long-term effect outweighs the initial investment. With a strong community behind you, the further development of the project and support for your own implementation are guaranteed.

"With a strong community behind you, the further development of the project and support for your own implementation are guaranteed."

What would you say are the three main advantages of using Free Software in the public administration?

We see the main advantages of Free Software in its full adaptability, data sovereignty, and the strengthening of the public good through collaborative development. In particular, the last point ensures that the project is not only developed further in terms of marketability, but also that the security and maintainability of the code base is ensured.

Final tip: What is a good start for a public administration to go for Free Software?

Start with something new and do not try to completely replace an existing system as a first step. You are looking for a new digital solution or want to launch a new offer? Free Software first! With this little reminder in mind, I am sure that your first Free Software based project can be a success.

We are looking forward to the future use and implementation of Free Software in Bühl's public sector. Thank you very much for this very interesting interview!

Questions asked for FSFE: Bonnie Mehring

The "Public Money? Public Code!" initiative aims to set Free Software as the standard for publicly financed software. The Free Software Foundation Europe together with over 190 civil society organisations and more than 28.000 individuals signed the open letter. We will use the signatures to contact decision makers and political representatives all over Europe and convince them to make public code the standard. You are invited to add your signature to make a bigger impact on publiccode.eu.

Support FSFE

Denmark keeps source code of Coronavirus tracing app secret

lundi 29 juin 2020 à 01:00

Denmark keeps source code of Coronavirus tracing app secret

Like many other European countries, Denmark also tries to track Sars-CoV-2 infections with a mobile phone tracing app. However, against advice by health organisations and despite positive examples by other countries, the app is proprietary, so not being released under a Free Software (also called Open Source) license.

Smittestop, the official tracing app released by the Danish government, is supposed to supplement the more traditional ways of combatting the Coronavirus with contact tracing. But instead of releasing the source code of the app under a Free Software license and thereby empowering the public as well as the scientific community to inspect, verify, improve and experiment with it, the app's source code is kept hidden.

This goes directly against the most recent recommendations from the WHO as well as the EU Commision's eHealth network. In the referenced paper, the WHO specifically states that:

"There should be full transparency about how the applications and application programming interfaces (APIs) operate, and publication of open source and open access codes. Individuals should also be provided with meaningful information about the existence of automated decision-making and how risk predictions are made, including how the algorithmic model was developed and the data used to train the model. Furthermore, there should be information about the model's utility and insights as to the types of errors that such a model may make."

Had the Danish government published the source code under a Free Software license, such transparency would have been provided to the public, and scientists and IT experts would have been able to peer review and improve the app's error margins, possibly helping interrupt more chains of infection.

On the app's homepage, the Danish government explains that the source code is not being published because of the risk of "security breaches" and to protect the public against malicious actors. However, IT security does not arise through an attackers' ignorance of the system under attack, but due to a proper and well-reviewed security design (also read p.22 in our expert publication). This decision, if anything, makes the app less secure – not more. Moreover, since the app is decentralised and is wired to nemID, the official Danish digital signature, security breaches are unlikely to occur.

Such false security concerns have not stopped the governments of Germany, Austria, Italy and Great Britain from complying with the WHO's and the EU Commission's transparency requirements and publish their contact tracing apps under a Free Software license. In fact, Germany, Austria and Italy all quoted security as one of the main points in favour of publishing the source code.

The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) strongly urges the Danish government to immediately rectify this situation and publish its "Smittestop" app under a Free Software license, with the source code fully available to the public.

Support FSFE

La Liberté des Routeurs en Europe +++ Hambourg soutient le Logiciel Libre +++ Parlement Européen

mardi 16 juin 2020 à 01:00

La Liberté des Routeurs en Europe +++ Hambourg soutient le Logiciel Libre +++ Parlement Européen

Dans notre lettre d'informations de Juin, vous pouvez vous informer entre autres sur les réalisations de la FSFE concernant la Liberté des Routeurs en Europe, sur un nouvel accord de coalition à Hambourg mettant en avant le Logiciel Libre et sur le Parlement Européen réclamant "Argent Public ? Code Public !". Comme toujours, vous y trouverez aussi des informations sur les activités de nos diverses communautés.

La Liberté des Routeurs est mise au défi par une nouvelle série de règles

Depuis 2013, la FSFE plaide pour la Liberté des Routeurs en Europe avec d'excellents résultats en Allemagne et une influence positive à travers l'Europe. Aujourd'hui, une nouvelle série de règles entre en jeu et concerne la Liberté des Routeurs, les nouvelles directives sur la position du Point de Terminaison du Réseau (PTR). Celles-ci sont le résultat de l'ébauche du corps des régulateurs Européens pour les communications électroniques (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications, BEREC). Dans la phase suivante, ces directives doivent être implantées localement par les agences de régulation nationales des états (National Regulatory Agencies, NRAs). Nous avons résumé les opportunités ainsi que les défis à venir.

D'un point de vue positif, le BEREC a reconnu la contribution apportée dans la discussion par la FSFE. Plus important encore, le BEREC a modifié le texte original afin d'y adopter notre position dans la mesure où la Liberté des Routeurs devrait être la règle lors de la détermination du Point de Terminaison du Réseau (PTR). Le BEREC a aussi explicitement reconnu un grand nombre d'arguments supplémentaires que nous avons apportés dans la discussion en faveur d'une réelle Liberté des Routeurs - de la neutralité du net à la souveraineté digitale des utilisateurs en passant par l'amélioration de l'innovation et de la concurrence. Malheureusement, les nouvelles directives du BEREC maintiennent la capacité de restreindre la Liberté des Routeurs à la discrétion des différents NRAs si celles-ci décident qu'il y a une "nécessité technologique objective" à intégrer les routeurs au réseau du fournisseur d'accès à internet (Internet Service Provider, ISP).

Les termes imprécis utilisés dans ces directives vont probablement créer des disparités lors des mises en œuvre nationales de 27 pays différents. Aidez-nous maintenant à surveiller leur implémentation. Les prochains six mois vont être essentiels pour comprendre si l'approche des NRAs va nuire ou profiter à la Liberté des Routeurs.

Quelques-un des nombreux bénéfices de la Liberté des Routeurs.

Hambourg met en avant le Logiciel Libre

Le mois dernier nous avons rendu compte du nouvel accord de coalition dans Munich adopte le principe de "Argent Public ? Code Public !". Ce mois-ci, nous sommes heureux d'annoncer que le nouvel accord de coalition à Hambourg suit une direction similaire et met en avant le Logiciel Libre.

Afin de renforcer la souveraineté numérique de Hambourg, la ville souhaite utiliser plus de Logiciel Libre dans le futur (voir l'accord de coalition en Allemand). Le but est de minimiser la dépendance aux fournisseurs individuels et de créer de la transparence. Partout où cela a du sens, la coopération avec d'autres administrations devrait être établie. Malheureusement, l'accord de coalition contient encore de nombreuses échappatoires, par exemple pour les procédures d'approvisionnement et pour les justifications diffuses protégeant les vendeurs de logiciel propriétaire.

Procédure de décharge au Parlement Européen

À la mi-mai, le Parlement Européen a voté la décharge de plusieurs institutions communautaires Européennes. Afin d'éviter des verrouillages de fournisseurs, d'être plus transparent et d'utiliser des systèmes plus sécurisés, le Parlement Européen recommande dans ses résolutions (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) que "le logiciel développé pour les institutions soit rendu disponible au public sous licences logicielles libres et open-source". À la FSFE, nous sommes heureux de voir nos demandes "Argent Public ? Code Public !" amplifiées par le Parlement Européen. Nous gardons un œil sur les institutions Européennes, afin de voir si elles vont adopter les recommandations du Parlement Européen dans le futur.

La FSFE fait face à un impact financier majeur en ces temps de distanciation physique de par l'annulation des conférences sur le Logiciel Libre, y compris nos propres évènements. Pour garder le mouvement pour la liberté logicielle solide et actif, merci de considérer donner une part de votre budget de conférence à des organisations de Logiciel Libre, incluant la FSFE.

Qu'avons-nous fait ? En interne et en dehors de la FSFE

Soyez actifs

Beaucoup de nos groupes locaux tiennent des réunions en ligne désormais, des réunions de groupe local à Berlin aux réunions de groupes nationaux en Italie et en Espagne, en passant par les réunions de groupes régionaux en Rhénanie. La plupart des ces réunions sont ouvertes à la participation des sympathisants de la FSFE. De nombreuses autres organisations qui se soucient de la liberté logicielle et des droits numériques tiennent aussi des réunions en ligne. Rejoignez-les et faites la connaissance de nouvelles personnes, discutez avec elles des sujets brûlants sur le Logiciel Libre et d'autres thèmes associés. Et utilisez du Logiciel Libre pour votre participation.

Participez à notre lettre d'information

Si vous souhaitez partager vos opinions, photos ou actualités, merci de nous les envoyer. Comme toujours, notre adresse est newsletter@fsfe.org. Nous sommes impatients de vous lire !

Si de plus vous souhaitez nous soutenir ainsi que notre travail, rejoignez notre communauté et aidez-nous avec un don ou une contribution mensuelle.

Merci à notre communauté, tous les volontaires, supporters et donatrices et donateurs qui rendent notre travail possible. Et merci à nos traductrices et traducteurs, qui vous permettent de lire cette lettre d'information dans votre langue maternelle.

Votre éditeur,

Erik Albers

Soutenez notre travail par un don

Support FSFE

Hamburg wants to focus more on Free Software

mercredi 10 juin 2020 à 01:00

Hamburg wants to focus more on Free Software

In Hamburg, the SPD and the Greens are stating in their coalition agreement to focus more on Free Software during their future term. The FSFE welcomes this step and will critically monitor its implementation.

In order to strengthen digital sovereignty of Hamburg, the city wants to use more Free Software in the future (see the PDF of the coalition agreement). The goal is to minimise the dependence on individual providers and create transparency. Wherever it appears meaningful, cooperation with other administrations should be established. However, the coalition agreement contains several loopholes, for example for procurement procedures and diffuse justification to protect proprietary software vendors.

Alexander Sander, the FSFE's Policy Manager, explains: "We are pleased that Hamburg has recognised the problems associated with the use of proprietary software and wants to focus more on the use of Free Software. However, the exceptions in the coalition agreement indicate at this point in time that the implementation could lead to problems and counteracting the goals. We will critically monitor the process and demand that first steps be taken quickly to make software developed with public money available to the general public. If it is public money, it should be public code as well."

Free Software gives everyone the right to use, understand, distribute and improve software for any purpose. Administrations also benefit from these freedoms when they rely on Free Software. More and more administrations all over Europe are using and developing Free Software in order to benefit from interoperable solutions, to avoid vendor lock ins, to be transparent and sovereign, to spend funds in the most efficient way and to foster innovation and collaboration.

As part of the "Public Money? Public Code!" campaign, FSFE is specifically campaigning for a change in policy towards Free Software. The "Public Money? Public Code!" initiative aims to set Free Software as the standard for publicly financed software. The Free Software Foundation Europe together with over 180 civil society organisations and more than 27.000 individuals signed the open letter. We will use the signatures to contact decision makers and political representatives all over Europe and convince them to make public code the standard. You are invited to add your signature to make a bigger impact on publiccode.eu/

Support FSFE