PROJET AUTOBLOG


Creative Commons

source: Creative Commons

⇐ retour index

The Public Domain is Alive and Well (for Now)

lundi 24 février 2020 à 16:42

Public domain advocates celebrated on January 1: for the second year in a row, published works newly entered the public domain in the United States due to copyright expiration.

To mark the occasion, Creative Commons (CC) collaborated with the Internet Archive, the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, Creative Commons USA, the Institute for Intellectual Property & Social Justice, and SPARC to hold the Public Domain Day (PDD) celebration on January 30 at the American University Washington College of Law. 

“This is a ‘good news’ story,” exclaimed Brewster Kahle (Founder and Digital Librarian, Internet Archive) at the start of the 1920s themed soiree, “Another year of the public domain!”

Celebrating another year of the public domain

Buster_Keaton_-_The_Navigator_film_poster
“The Navigator,” 1924 film poster by Buster Keaton in the public domain

Indeed, there is a reason to celebrate. As we noted last year, January 2019 marked the first time works entered the public domain since the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act—which extended copyright terms “to the life of the author plus 70 years, and for works of corporate authorship to 120 years after creation or 95 years after publication, whichever end is earlier.” 

The Copyright Term Extension Act ultimately halted the flow of published works into the public domain for 20 years. “The celebration of the public domain used to be a sad affair…,” remarked panelist Julia Reda (Fellow, Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society). However, as of 1 January 2019, works from 1923 became freely accessible and reusable by anyone, anywhere. This year, works from 1924 followed suit; from George Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue to Buster Keaton’s The Navigator.

“We have to be constantly vigilant. Settled expectations can be disrupted, and thus need to be defended.” Michael Carroll

Despite the progress that’s been made since the re-opening of the public domain, Reda told attendees that they still have to create “strategies to limit the damage of long copyright terms.”

Echoing Reda’s concern that the public domain is still at risk, panelist Michael Carroll (Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law) warned, “We have to be constantly vigilant. Settled expectations can be disrupted, and thus need to be defended.” 

Contributing to the public domain through art

Beyond providing an important discussion space for public domain advocates and researchers, we also wanted to highlight the work of artists who contribute to the public domain. Therefore, we were excited to showcase the creative works of six local artists: Darnell Gardner, David Amoroso, Laci Jordan, Naturel, Rikasso, and Tenbeete Solomon. These artists were asked to “remix” art in the public domain and invited to share their creative process during the event.

A remix of Diego Rivera’s 1924 piece, “Day of the Dead” by Trapbob.

For example, Tenbeete Solomon, aka Trapbob, remixed Diego Rivera’s 1924 piece, Day of the Dead. “I love the celebration of something that’s dark,” explained Solomon, “[I wanted to] bring the piece into the now, so I decided to make women the focal point.”

When asked what he would like to ask the artist of the original piece, Natural, who remixed  Contrasts by Kandinsky Vasily, responded, “How would it feel to know your work is being shared with the world a second time?” 

Too important to “protect”

As the event drew to a close, many attendees were left wondering what’s in store for the public domain. Although its future appears secure and stable for now, that can quickly change. Further, panelist Amanda Levendowski (Director, Intellectual Property and Information Policy Clinic,  Georgetown University) pointed out that the public domain remains largely “white, wealthy, and Western.” With this in mind, perhaps it’s time to reframe and broaden the fight for the public domain as a global fight for “user rights” and “free speech.”

The public domain should be a treasure trove of humanity’s remixes; artifacts that are arguably too important to be “protected” by copyright because we all benefit when knowledge, culture, and history are made accessible and shareable.

“Everything we do is a remix,” Natural remarked, “we need cultural anchors to communicate.”

To watch and listen to all of the presentations and panels from the 2020 Public Domain Day celebration, access the webcast here. Thank you again to all of our collaborators for this event, as well as the participants and attendees. See you next year! 

The post The Public Domain is Alive and Well (for Now) appeared first on Creative Commons.

Why We’re Advocating for a Cautious Approach to Copyright and Artificial Intelligence

jeudi 20 février 2020 à 22:29

On 14 February 2020, Creative Commons (CC) submitted its comments on the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)’s Issues Paper* as part of WIPO’s consultation process on artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) policy.

In this post, we briefly present our main arguments for a cautious approach to regulating AI through copyright or any new IP rights.

Technological developments in AI are fast-paced and raise complex policy, legal, and ethical issues that deserve global attention. However, AI needs to be properly understood before any copyright implications can be addressed. At this nascent stage of AI technology, there lacks consensus on how to define AI. 

As discussed more fully in our submission, AI algorithms differ in the depth and breadth of input required to produce coherent output, and it’s not clear how to judge the originality of a work essentially composed of random snippets of thousands or millions of input works. There is also uncertainty about whether and to what extent AI is capable of producing content “autonomously” without any direct human involvement, and whether AI outputs should be protected by copyright. Clarity on these and other basic definitions in the “AI” space is a prerequisite to competent regulation in this arena. 

At present, it is ill-advised to force the application of the copyright system—an antiquated system that has yet to adapt to the digital environment—onto AI. 

Human creativity is the bedrock of copyright. We ought to maintain the expectation that direct human, authorial involvement exists as a pre-condition to determining whether a work is worthy of copyright protection. Outputs from a mechanical process with no direct human involvement should not constitute works protected by copyright absent further examination and understanding of how the many different types of AI operate, generate output, and how closely humans are generally involved in the process. Simply put, it is premature to conclude that all AI applications should be considered “creators.” 

AI-generated outputs should not as a default be considered original works. Courts the world over have affirmed that originality is a reflection of the intellectual, creative choices made by the author. The originality bar may be low, but it does exist and must be respected. 

Regarding the use of copyright material as inputs in AI applications, Creative Commons’ FAQs clarify how the CC licenses work in the context of openly licensed content that is used to train AI tools. 

Copyright is not designed to handle any and all policy issues adjacent to the creation and use of IP. To wit, press publisher rights and the ongoing debate over broadcasting rights demonstrate the danger of overstretching copyright to regulate peripheral issues. Using copyright to govern AI is unwise and contradictory to copyright’s primordial function of offering an enabling environment for human creativity to flourish. Issues such as ethics, privacy, and personality rights, among many others, are valid concerns, but they should be addressed and debated in their respective policy arena, not within the framework of copyright.

Using copyright to govern AI is unwise and contradictory to copyright’s primordial function of offering an enabling environment for human creativity to flourish.

For the same reasons, we strongly urge against the temptation to create new sui generis (specific, tailor-made) rights established for AI-generated content. Incentives and rewards in recognition of the investment made and the innovation brought about by the organizations and individuals involved in the development of AI can be found in other areas, including patents, trade secret laws, and laws protecting against unfair competition. 

We suggest proper safeguards if copyright or new rights apply to AI

Assuming WIPO members are keen to rely on copyright or new sui generis rights to regulate AI and protect AI-generated content despite our concerns, this should be done conservatively and with restraint. Members should set a high bar for the creation of such new rights, consider a much lesser term of protection than that provided to the original works created by human creators, and ensure that robust exceptions and limitations are in place to uphold users’ rights, safeguard the public interest, and ensure a vibrant public domain. 

Next steps

Creative Commons looks forward to the next version of the WIPO Issues Paper and will continue to take part in WIPO’s discussion process on AI and IP

To learn more about CC’s work with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), check out this Wiki page


*The WIPO consultation aims to gather submissions to identify important issues related to AI and IP, which will form the basis of structured discussions in the future. For example, the consultation seeks answers to questions such as:

 

The post Why We’re Advocating for a Cautious Approach to Copyright and Artificial Intelligence appeared first on Creative Commons.

Welcome Our Newest Staff Members!

mercredi 19 février 2020 à 17:23

Over the past few months, we have added four new staff members to our team: Network Manager Julia Brungs; Development Manager M Chakraborty; Data Engineer Brent Moran; and Open Policy Manager Brigitte Vézina.

Learn more about our newest staff members below!

Julia Brungs
Julia Brungs (Photo by Victoria Heath, CC BY)

Julia Brungs, Network Manager

Prior to joining CC, Julia led the cultural heritage work at IFLA and coordinated EU projects for Europeana. She is passionate about open culture and bringing people together.

Julia lives in Finland and she loves Finnish libraries, saunas, and nature.

 

 

Image credit: “Proserpine (1874) by Dante Gabriel Rossetti 1828-1882, CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

M Chakraborty, Development Manager

M supports CC’s global fundraising efforts and strategy. She has a background in international development, gender justice, and human rights spaces. When not fundraising, she tries to learn new languages or travel.

M is currently based in California.

 

 

Brent Moran
Brent Moran (Photo by Victoria Heath, CC BY)

Brent Moran, Data Engineer

Brent believes that the internet is one of the most powerful tools available for collaboration on, and sharing of, creative output. He hopes that his work at CC removes barriers to the free flow of content on the internet.  

Brent lives on the western edge of Germany with his fiancée.

 

Brigitte Vézina
Brigitte Vézina (Photo by Victoria Heath, CC BY)

Brigitte Vézina, Open Policy Manager

Before joining CC, Brigitte worked as a legal officer at WIPO and then ran her own consultancy on copyright matters. She gets a kick out of tackling the fuzzy legal and policy issues that stand in the way of access, use, re-use, and the remix of culture and knowledge.

She lives in the Netherlands with her husband and two kids. 

 

Please join us in welcoming the newest members of our team!

As a non-profit organization, we need you to help us keep the lights on, support our staff, and complete our mission. Please become a CC supporter today!💡

The post Welcome Our Newest Staff Members! appeared first on Creative Commons.

CC Launches the Global Search for Its Next Chief Executive Officer

mercredi 29 janvier 2020 à 17:11

I’m delighted to announce, on behalf of the Creative Commons (CC) Board of Directors, the formal launch of the global search for the next Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of CC.

The timing could not be more exciting for CC. We will welcome our next CEO as we prepare to enter our third decade as the global standard for sharing works of knowledge and creativity.

Our new CEO will both shape the organization’s future strategy and operationally lead the team and community by leveraging CC’s tremendous assets. These assets include CC’s core competencies, credibility, and track record; as well as the skills, commitment, and passion of its talented board of directors, advisory council, staff, global network, and volunteers.

This is an outstanding opportunity for a creative strategist and manager to champion the work of a leading voice in the open movement as it evolves its role within its community and the world. 

The full job description can be accessed here.

Questions or confidential nominations can be shared with our search partners at Viewcrest Advisors: creativecommons@viewcrestadvisors.com

Thank you for sharing this post broadly! 

Molly Van Houweling | Creative Commons Board Chair

The post CC Launches the Global Search for Its Next Chief Executive Officer appeared first on Creative Commons.

Here’s a Sneak Peek at the Updated Creative Commons License Chooser

lundi 27 janvier 2020 à 21:16

This is part of a series of posts introducing the projects built by open source contributors mentored by Creative Commons during Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2019. Ari Madian was one of those contributors and we are grateful for his work on this project.

The Creative Commons (CC) License Chooser was made nearly 15 years ago and is long overdue for an update. The purpose of the CC Chooser is to help users choose which CC license is right for them and their needs. However, since its release, it has fallen short in a few respects. 

First, the user interface is quite cluttered, with no clear visual hierarchy. For example, elements on the page appear to be fighting for equal importance. Second, the lack of a clear call-to-action makes it difficult to get started using the tool. Third, it’s difficult to understand what the selected license means, as well as get an idea of what the full CC license suite has to offer due to a lack of information.

The New Chooser

Since May 2019, an updated version of the CC License Chooser has been in development as part of the 2019 Google Summer of Code (GSoC). The main goal of the original GSoC project, “Human-Centered Education of CC Licenses,” was to revamp the CC Chooser with a greater focus on usability and on the educational experience of the license suite. Today, the updated CC Chooser is still a work in progress, particularly with regards to the user interface design and internationalization.

A screenshot of the updated CC License Chooser, as of early 2019.

The screenshot above shows a small section of the new CC Chooser. At the top of the image is the updated CC license selection section. In terms of design and usability, this is already a huge improvement over the existing CC Chooser. However, we’re still making minor improvements based on user feedback. We’ve carried over the functionality of the HTML license mark generator from the original CC Chooser but added rich text generation, simplified it to be more usable, and brought a more contemporary look to the generated mark.

A new addition to the CC Chooser is what we call the “Help Section,” which can be seen at the bottom of the image. The purpose of this section is to help answer questions that users might have during the license selection process and to help users get a better idea of what the CC license suite has to offer, as well as how it works.

What’s Next?

The new CC Chooser still needs some work before it’s ready to become the CC Chooser. For example, we need to:

The UI improvements and internationalization work are core objectives of the Outreachy internship running from December 2019 to March 2020. Olga Bulat is the Outreachy intern currently working on the CC License Chooser. She’s experimenting with the introduction of a step-based system for CC license selection, which will help guide the user through the various licensing considerations. She’ll also be collaborating with CC’s legal counsel and communications team to provide updated text describing each license in a clear and succinct way. 

Tasks, issues, and discussions related to the release of the new CC Chooser are tracked with the Launch Milestone in the creativecommons/cc-chooser repository on GitHub.

How Can I Contribute?

Anyone can contribute by testing the beta deployment of the new CC License Chooser. At the top of the page, there is a link to a feedback form. Take a look at the new CC Chooser and let us know what you think! You can also join the #cc-dev-license-chooser channel on Creative Commons’ Slack and keep an eye out for calls for volunteers to test usability.

Those who are technically inclined can contribute by fixing code issues, as well as finding and reporting bugs. The GitHub repo for the new CC Chooser is called “cc-chooser,” and can be found here. Please remember to read the contributing section in the chooser repo’s README. Issues marked with the green “help wanted” tag are open to contributors, however issues marked with the yellow “in progress” tag are not open.

Quick Links

The post Here’s a Sneak Peek at the Updated Creative Commons License Chooser appeared first on Creative Commons.