PROJET AUTOBLOG


TorrentFreak

Archivé

Site original : TorrentFreak

⇐ retour index

Popcorn Time For Music Has Arrived!

lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 22:02

cassetteLast month, news of an upcoming piece of music software began to cause waves in the media.

Cleverly marketed as the Popcorn Time for music, Aurous promised to use the BitTorrent network to stream pirated music to the masses, for free.

This weekend the first version of the software made it’s debut and on first sight it looks great. The user-interface reminds one of other streaming apps such as Spotify and is free of advertisements.

However, after playing with the application for a little while the excitement quickly begins to fade.

The first thing that stands out is the limited content library. Many artists and tracks are absent, for example. In addition, the app doesn’t allow users to sort per album, artist, or create playlists.

On the technical side there’s an unpleasant surprise as well. For now, Aurous doesn’t use BitTorrent at all, instead it pulls MP3s from external services such as Pleer and VK.

Perhaps these issues will eventually be resolved in the future, but overall Aurous fails to impress.

Aurous

aurous1

The same is true for another player that launched previously, TorrentTunes. The application, which also has a web based player, does use the BitTorrent network and allows people to stream music.

TorrentTunes also offers more advanced discovery options than Aurous. Technically everything seems to work fine and like Aurous the coding may be brilliant, but again there’s something crucial missing.

A competitive advantage, mostly in terms of content.

Popcorn Time became iconic because it offers an appealing and easy to use interface, but looks alone are not good enough to impress. The true power of Popcorn Time comes from the content, where it beats many legal streaming services including Netflix.

TorrentTunes

torrenttunes

Aurous and TorrentTunes may look nice and work well, but these “pirate” apps lose out to legal services such as Spotify when it comes to content. They even have a hard time beating YouTube.

Even if the apps manage to catch up in terms of content there will be other issues, such as speed. Loading a track from a torrent file being shared by a handful of people is not going to be instant.

This doesn’t mean that both apps won’t get any users. There may still be plenty of interest, but it will be nothing compared to Popcorn Time’s ‘revolution.’

The crucial issue is that it’s harder for “pirate” music apps to stand out compared to legal alternatives. There’s simply not much room to improve other than the price tag. Perhaps this is something the movie industry should take note of.

So yes, the Popcorn Time for music has arrived. Only it arrived more than half a decade ago, and it’s called Spotify.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Is Streaming Pirated Movies Illegal? EU Court to Decide

lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 16:48

moviesOnline streaming continues to gain in popularity, both from authorized and pirate sources.

Unlike traditional forms of downloading, however, in many countries the legality of viewing unauthorized streams remains unclear.

In the European Union this may change in the near future. Earlier this month a Dutch court referred several streaming related questions to the EU Court of Justice.

The questions were raised in a case between Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN and the Filmspeler.nl shop, which sells “piracy configured” media players. While these devices don’t host any infringing content, they ship with add-ons that make it very easy to watch infringing content.

While BREIN argues that this is illegal a local court is not yet convinced that it’s an offense under current law and wants Europe’s highest court to decide.

The first set of questions is closely tied to the case and asks whether selling pre-programmed media-players with links to pirate sources is permitted, and whether it matters if the add-ons are freely available, among other things.

These are important questions as pre-loaded boxes are commonly sold in the EU. Despite the legal uncertainty, this has already resulted in a raid and arrest by UK police earlier this year.

The second set of questions is even more crucial since it relates to streaming in general, which affects millions of users and large multinationals such as Google. Broadly translated, the court first asks the following question:

“Is it lawful under EU law to temporarily reproduce content through streaming if the content originates from a third-party website where it’s made available without permission?”

If this is not the case, then the EU Court of Justice is asked to clarify whether it violates the “three-step-test” of the EU Copyright Directive.

The answers will be of interest to many stakeholders including Google who have a significant interest in streaming related issues because of YouTube, and members of the general public since streaming is so common now.

BREIN is happy with the court’s referral and hopes that the EU Court’s ruling will bring more clarity on the streaming issue. But for now, it doesn’t plan to stop going after sellers of pirate boxes.

“BREIN is pleased that more clarity will be given through these fundamental questions which in the current case law of the CJEU stay unanswered. Meanwhile BREIN persists in its approach towards traders of similar media-players with illegal preprogrammed software,” the group notes.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Dallas Buyers Club Refuses to Give Up on Australia Piracy Battle

lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 10:46

dallasBack in April the company behind the movie Dallas Buyers Club (DBC) won the right to obtain the personal details of 4,726 individuals said to have downloaded and shared the hit movie in Australia.

As six Australian ISPs – iiNet, Internode, Dodo, Amnet, Adam Internet and Wideband Networks – prepared to hand over the information to DBC, Justice Nye Perram expressed concern over the conduct of the movie company in the United States.

So, to ensure that so-called ‘speculative invoicing’ didn’t come to Oz, the judge asked DBC to provide details on how it would be approaching alleged infringers before he’d order the release of their personal details.

In June it was revealed that DBC wanted to interrogate alleged infringers using an aggressive telephone script backed up by a settlement letter which wrongfully implied that guilt of copyright infringement had already been established.

In a ruling handed down two months later, Justice Perram expressed real concern at the proposals of DBC and the company’s intentions to extract potentially large ‘fines’ and damages from alleged infringers.

Much to the company’s disappointment he told DBC that it could claim for the price of the film and a proportion of the amount spent on tracking down an alleged infringer, but that’s it. And, to ensure that DBC didn’t go against his wishes, he ordered the film outfit to pay a AUS$600,000 bond before any subscriber information is released.

In September, DBC’s lawfirm in Australia said the company wouldn’t appeal the decision, but indicated that there might be another way to get the process moving again.

“We think there may be another way of achieving the outcome [we want] without having to go through an appeal,” said Michael Bradley of Marque Lawyers.

It’s taken more than a month but DBC’s latest ploy has now been made public. The movie outfit believes that if it can convince Justice Perram that his fears over the possible conduct of the company are misplaced, things may be able to move forward.

So, as a confidence-building measure, it’s believed that DBC will ask the court to release a limited number of alleged infringers’ identities so that the judge can see for himself that the company can conduct itself properly.

According to ITNews, DBC will request the personal details of 10% of the original 4,726 subscribers in order to conduct a test-run of sorts. To reflect the change in numbers, DBC will ask for the bond to be dropped from AUS$600,000 to AUS$60,000.

However, it’s understood that DBC still wants to use the aggressive letter and telephone script revealed to the court earlier this year, which included demands for alleged infringers to reveal how much they earn.

How any of this can positively effect the judge’s current position that DBC can only claim for the cost of the movie plus damages is unclear. When approached for clarification DBC lawfirm Marque Lawyers refused to comment.

While it would be unwise to try and second-guess DBC, history shows us that the company is in the lawsuit business not only as a way of reducing piracy, but also as a means of making money. It’s certainly possible that DBC is scrambling to cover the already sizable costs it has incurred Down Under, but it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that it still has its eyes on a much bigger prize.

The company has already shown how aggressive it can be in the United States (such as demanding two-hour depositions of alleged infringers), so there’s absolutely no reason to think that it will go willingly light on Australians – unless it’s forced to by the court.

The good news for Australians is that Justice Perram – unlike most other judges in other jurisdictions – really seems to understand how ‘trolls’ like DBC operate. A directions hearing will take place on November 2, let’s see what he has in store.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 10/12/15

lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 09:12

southpawThis week we have four newcomers in our chart.

Southpaw is the most downloaded movie.

The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are BD/DVDrips unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

Ranking (last week) Movie IMDb Rating / Trailer
torrentfreak.com
1 (6) Southpaw 7.6 / trailer
2 (1) Jurassic World 7.2 / trailer
3 (3) Terminator Genisys 6.8 / trailer
4 (…) Pixels 5.6 / trailer
5 (…) Paper Towns 6.6 / trailer
6 (2) Tomorrowland 6.6 / trailer
7 (…) Dope 7.5 / trailer
8 (…) Knock Knock (HDRip) 5.5 / trailer
9 (4) San Andreas 6.2 / trailer
10 (5) Avengers: Age of Ultron 7.8 / trailer

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Movie Piracy Veteran Recalls 20 Years in The Scene

dimanche 11 octobre 2015 à 17:56

matine-smallTopsites are top-secret, high-speed servers used by piracy release groups and their affiliates for the storage and distribution of unauthorized copyrighted content. Together, these silicon-powered caches and their carbon-based operators form an entity known as The Scene.

Members of this tight-knit but sprawling network are known for their vigilance, and for good reason too. As the source of tens – maybe hundreds – of thousands of ‘pirate’ releases every year, law enforcement has a keen interest in bringing them down. But for many the rewards of Scene life are well worth the risks. Twenty years ago, SaInT began taking lots of them.

“I started camming in the early 90s for a group called HBO (the founder of which ran a New York bootleg ring) and that’s when I learned the craft and understanding of a camcorder and its technology,” SaInT informs TorrentFreak.

SaInT received his first camera (a Sony) from a topsite affiliate but quality was lacking. Soon he upgraded to what he describes as “professional grade” Panasonic kit and after doing work for infamous release group Centropy, SaInT moved on to form another famous operation.

“At that point we knew we had it. I gathered one more person to the crew that I trusted, we will just call him Mr P for now. He helped find a few topsites and someone who could program and run our own sites and BNCs. Here, ‘MaTinE’ was born.”

Until its demise just a couple of years ago, MaTinE was a big name. A cursory flip through most torrent sites reveals releases as current as 2013, but the group dates back to at least 2003 with the Internet debut of titles including Spy Kids 3D plus screener copies of Matrix Revolutions and a director’s cut of Alien.

matine-releases

“We always recorded during matinee sessions after the early days as it was the safest rime to record. We didn’t just record here or there – every cameraman was taught how to choose theaters to record in and knew how to rotate to avoid the MPAA and the feds,” SaInT says.

“I was the first cameraman. When I mean cameraman I mean we didn’t use Asian silvers [pressed, pirate DVDs] off the street or crap recordings for our sources. We used our own high quality recordings with direct audio most of the time.”

MaTinE’s ‘direct audio’ was often sourced from DTS discs, a huge improvement over microphoned and audience-polluted ‘cam’ soundtracks. But while DTS discs could be accessed for a while, those dried up too.

“Back in the day there was a tool to rip audio from the DTS discs used in theaters. Then all you had to do was sync the audio with the video. It wasn’t until later when DTS2 came out that everything was crushed for a while. Then people started recording audio from drive-in theaters as they broadcast that over private radio stations,” SaInT explains.

Soon MaTinE was establishing new suppliers and gaining access to coveted screeners, workprints and top-grade hardware. As it reached maturity a total of seven people were in the group. Each member had a precise job and each was dedicated to doing it well, SaInT included.

“For example, to get the best quality of a movie for a bright clear picture your lux levels on the camera needed to be right. To stop the flicker, i’d adjust the shutter speed one notch. To position a camera for a perfect image, i’d sit in the center back row with a large coke and no straw of course. Then sit the cam on the coke and adjust before the movie started.”

But while for MaTinE maintaining quality meant the rejection of foreign street-level sources, other Scene groups were still involved with piracy groups in the Far East. In fact, those Far East piracy groups needed video sources too and were prepared to enter mutual back-scratching arrangements with the Scene to get them.

“Most groups had ties to Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. They were your main source for the funding of projects or supply of equipment in return for allowing them to have your release early,” SaInT explains. The image below shows a 2004 appeal from MaTinE for the donation of camming equipment.

matine-cam

SaInT says that at one point he was offered $3,000 each for the supply of movies on the day of their release but his only interest was to pursue the art of achieving the best possible quality. Inevitably, however, the lure of cash was too much for some, with tragic consequences.

Like those featuring MaTinE, Centropy and maVen, during the 2000s a VideoCD tag on an Internet movie release was a sign of quality. However, not all was well behind the scenes.

While SaInT concedes he was “cool” with a founding member of VideoCD, members of that group had been sending video to the Far East in return for cash, something generally frowned upon in the Scene. But worse still and without SaInT’s knowledge, other MaTinE members had also been selling the group’s content to VideoCD affiliates overseas. That was only discovered when a member of VideoCD was busted.

“The VideoCD arrest happened and we found ourselves in a problematic position. We didn’t know some of our members had been selling our releases off raw [large files, before compression] to VideoCD’s contact in Singapore,” he explains.

videocd-ascii“Briefly we shut down shop and me and the lead two others regrouped and corrected our issues. We had rules and selling our releases was one thing we didn’t allow, especially raw copies. We just wanted to be the fastest and most dominant release group of early releases.”

While MaTinE survived, there were casualties. SaInT recalls VideoCD members being arrested and given hefty sentences. Their seized computers led the authorities to more people which in turn led to more sites.

“It’s obvious that VideoCD had allowed the feds in doors they could never enter before,” he notes.

MaTinE carried on until 2010, but then tragedy hit when one of their cammers was arrested for an unrelated but serious offense.

“His arrest wasn’t for recording but much worse. So, in fear of him using us as a bargaining chip, we dismantled and wiped his computer. After a period of time away we returned to hammer away again until the final blow in 2013.”

The beginning of the end

After a few years away from the Scene, MaTinE returned to an Internet even more flooded with torrents and a climate in which every one of their releases found itself recoded and passed off as someone else’s work.

“No group back in the day could do that, in the Scene there were rules. So in our NFOs we denounced many groups because of this. We knew no one could compete,” SaInT says.

Then after a decade of excitement, pride, close shaves and then disappointment, two years ago SaInT himself ran into trouble. In a theater that shall remain nameless and with camera in hand, SaInT took his place for the umpteenth time to do what he did best. Then suddenly, during the screening, the police rushed him.

“I know what led them there. During the recording there was only one set of people. A lady stood up. Turning towards the doors at the back of theater, she spotted a glare off the camera lens. She alerted the lady up front who called the detectives,” he reveals.

It soon became evident that the police had been watching SaInT and another member for a couple of years, but up until that fateful day had drawn a blank due to the pair’s caution. Now they had what they needed to prosecute.

“I was charged on a count of recording a film under license without consent. All my property was confiscated and used to try and prove what movies I had recorded with that camera because each camera digital signatures each image uniquely,” he reveals.

“The studios tied a few movies in which [security] dots where missed or not taken out. I was handed down a small sentence without jail because my lawyer was able to show that they couldn’t prove directly that I recorded the movies.”

dots

After his arrest, SaInT says that big decisions had to be made. He’s vague as to what happened to MaTinE but hints that even today people are benefiting from the group. That being said, his personal involvement is over.

“I am keeping a good distance. I must for the sake of my freedom and my kids. I had a long run. 20 years is a long run. I can’t say that I will never do it again and won’t return to the Scene. But as of right now SaInT is retired and family driven.”

The future

While SaInT might be out of the game he says that others trying to fill the gap should look back, not forward.

“No good low light cameras have been made in the past four years. Most are now focused on HD and Ultra 4k tech. Canon and Panasonic made the last good cams. Nothing under $1500 though,” he notes.

“To get Centropy and MaTinE quality you will need about $3500 or more. I won’t say which one but Canon released an HD camcorder that transfers movies via Bluetooth to a computer and has the best low light tech ever. It’s so good you can be in a pitch black room and see everything just fine with great picture quality. I have one in a closet right now with about $4k worth of accessories.”

Closing

“I will always love early true copies of movies. I’ve seen the rise and fall of many great people in this race. I am proud I defined standards for the Scene and was a key player in doing so. I feel like a grandfather of the Scene honestly,” SaInT says.

“I have no respect for groups who can’t provide their own sources. In reality they’re not even groups, just lame thieves. I wish more groups would inspire themselves for the better, rather than faking it.”

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.