PROJET AUTOBLOG


TorrentFreak

Archivé

Site original : TorrentFreak

⇐ retour index

Movie Cammer & Prolific Uploader Receives Community Sentence

mardi 7 février 2017 à 17:12

When movies quickly become available online following their theatrical release, it’s likely that a copy has been recorded in a cinema. A wide range of cloaking techniques are used but in basic terms, someone points a camera at the screen and hits record.

The copies subsequently made available vary in quality, from passable to absolutely terrible. Nevertheless, so-called ‘cam’ copies of movies maintain their popularity online, and their existence is often referenced as the most damaging form of movie piracy.

As a result, copyright holders work hard to crack down on so-called ‘cammers,’ with two of the riskiest places being the United States and the United Kingdom. Cases rarely end well for defendants, with custodial sentences often the outcome. However, it doesn’t always go that way.

Back in September 2015, copies of American Ultra and Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials were recorded in Cineworld Cinema in Nottingham on their day of release and subsequently uploaded to the Internet.

Following a joint operation between EMSOU (the East Midlands Special Operations Unit), FACT (the Federation Against Copyright Theft) and the FCPA (Film Content Protection Agency), investigators found their way to then 33-year-old Shaun Patrick Forry.

Officers from the Government Agency Intelligence Network Disruption Team and EMSOU executed search warrants in the Hinkley area, with laptops and other equipment taken away for examination. FACT operatives were also in attendance.

Forry was arrested on suspicion of recording both movies and uploading them to the Internet. He was questioned and bailed pending further inquiries. The investigation later revealed that Forry had distributed more than 670 films online since August 2013, some of them while on police bail.

He subsequently pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of articles for use in fraud and one count of distributing copyrighted films. Previously, an individual who uploaded Fast & Furious 6 to the Internet received a 33-month jail sentence, but in this case the defendant got off relatively lightly.

According to a report from local police, Forry was sentenced yesterday at Nottingham Crown Court. He received an 18-month community order and was told to complete 150 hours unpaid work. But despite the relative slap on the wrist, the Film Content Protection Agency insist this was a serious case.

“This is a highly significant case concerning the illegal recording of films belonging to two UK film distributors, followed by the release of those films online,” says Simon Brown, Director of the FCPA.

“Over 90% of pirated films originate from a copy recorded during a public performance in cinemas worldwide, so it’s vital that offenders like Mr. Forry are identified and arrested promptly to prevent further damage to our film industry.

“Piracy not only costs the film industry millions of pounds but can also affect thousands of jobs, so we welcome this conviction. We thank the East Midlands GAIN for their diligent assistance in this case.”

It’s likely that moving forward we’ll hear quite a bit more about the Film Content Protection Agency. While historical camming cases were usually handled by the Federation Against Copyright Theft, a new FCPA unit formed in October 2016 will now spearhead anti-camming activity in the UK.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Movie Industry Wants Irish ISPs to Block Pirate Movie Streaming Portals

mardi 7 février 2017 à 10:07

Pirate site blocking has been a topic of ongoing discussion throughout Europe, with The Pirate Bay as one of the main targets.

This is also true in Ireland where the notorious torrent site was first blocked in 2009 as part of a voluntary agreement between copyright holders and local ISP Eircom.

A few years later other major Internet providers were ordered to follow suit. The High Court in Ireland concluded that the Pirate Bay caused substantial harm to various rightsholders, and ordered several large ISPs to block the site on its networks.

Fast forward to today, and another range of blockades is looming on the horizon. The Motion Picture Association (MPA) has filed a case at the Commercial Court, hoping to block access to three popular streaming sites; movie4k.to, primewire.ag and onwatchseries.to.

Watchseries is the most popular of the three, according to the movie group, good for nearly two million visitors from Ireland last October. Primewire had 1.26 million Irish visitors in the same month, followed by Movie4k with 200,000 visitors.

Watchseries

RTE reports that the MPA’s fresh blocking demands are targeting a total of eight ISPs – Eir, Sky Ireland, Vodafone Ireland, Virgin Media Ireland, Three Ireland, Digiweb, Imagine Telecommunications and Magnet Networks.

Based on yesterday’s hearing it appears to be only a matter of time before the three sites will be blocked.

None of the ISPs have raised principle objections against a court determination in this case. That said, reports suggest that there are still a few finer details that have to be worked out, which could include issues regarding costs and the technical implementation.

If granted, the question remains whether any new blocks will be effective to limit the availability of pirated movies in Ireland. The three targeted sites are just the tip of the iceberg, and recent history has repeatedly shown that people quite easily switch to new sources.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

RIAA Labels Sue Hip-Hop Mixtape Download Site Spinrilla

lundi 6 février 2017 à 17:01

spinrillaFor several decades, mixtapes have formed an integral part of the hip-hop culture.

In the eighties and early nineties this was mostly done through cassettes, later followed by CDs, and in the present day and age a mixtape often comes in the form of MP3 files.

One of the most popular mixtape portals on the Internet today is Spinrilla. The service, which allows users to stream and download tracks through its website or mobile apps, has hundreds of thousands of users per month.

Although Spinrilla notes that its takes “copyright infringement very seriously,” this couldn’t prevent the service from running into legal trouble.

A group of well-known labels is now targeting the site over alleged copyright infringement. The coalition of record labels including Sony Music, Warner Bros. Records, and Universal Music Group have filed a lawsuit against Spinrilla.

In the complaint (pdf) submitted to a Federal Court in Georgia late last week, the labels describe Spinrilla as a business that facilitates copyright infringement. the site allegedly offers more than 21,000 tracks of artists such as from Kendrick Lamar and Kanye West, without permission of the owners.

“By offering free access to copyrighted content, Defendants drive a tremendous and growing number of visitors to their website and apps. Spinrilla.com receives nearly two million visits a month, a majority from U.S.-based visitors,” the labels write in the complaint.

“The Spinrilla apps have been downloaded millions of times. Users like Spinrilla’s service for obvious reasons. To quote one reviewer of the Spinrilla app: ‘It has all the hot music for free,” they add.

The labels estimate that the Spinrilla Android app has been downloaded and installed between 5 and 10 million times. This means that it’s among the most popular music apps offered on the Google Play store, ranking higher than Apple’s Music app, the Amazon Music app, and the SiriusXM Radio app.

This isn’t the first time that the RIAA labels have gone head to head with a website that offers music for free. However, Spinrilla is not your typical “shady” MP3 download portal.

The service was founded by Dylan Copeland from Atlanta and is incorporated in the United States. The company earns money through advertising and recently partnered with AOL to optimize its revenue, with success.

“Video has proven to be the highest paying & most engaging form of ad for us without ruining the user experience. Users understand that they’re getting access to free streaming music, so one video ad every 60 minutes isn’t seen as a problem,” Copeland comments in a case study AOL published.

According to the RIAA, however, it is clear that Spinrilla has crossed a line by offering copyrighted music without permission. They hope the labels will be properly compensated through the lawsuit and that an injunction will pull it offline swiftly.

“Spinrilla specializes in ripping off music creators by offering thousands of unlicensed sound recordings for free,” the RIAA said in a public statement, which HWR first reported.

“Fans today have access to millions upon millions of songs from innovative platforms and services that pay creators — this kind of illicit activity has no place in today’s music marketplace.”

Spinrilla itself has yet to comment on the case.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Music, Movie & Gaming Industries Seek Piracy Blockades in Belgium

lundi 6 février 2017 à 10:10

blocked-censorBack in 2011, Belgium was one of the first countries to implement a court-ordered Pirate Bay blockade. The action was the result of a lawsuit between the Belgian Anti-Piracy Foundation (BAF) and ISPs Belgacom and Telenet.

After being tested in many countries around Europe, especially the UK where thousands of domains are now inaccessible, the site-blocking train has returned to Belgium.

The Belgian Entertainment Association was formed nine years ago following a local merger of International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI, music industry), the Belgian Video Federation (BVF, videos), and the Belgian Luxembourg Interactive Software Association (BLISA, videogames).

On Wednesday, the organization filed a lawsuit at the French commercial court in Brussels. Belgian news outlet De Tijd reports that it wants local Internet service providers to block subscriber access to several ‘pirate’ sites.

Speaking with TorrentFreak, BEA director Olivier Maeterlinck says that several popular streaming sites are being targeted initially.

“Our action aims to block nine of the most popular streaming sites which offer copyright-protected content on a massive scale and without authorisation,” Maeterlinck says.

“In accordance with the principles established by the CJEU (UPC Telekabel and GS Media), BEA seeks a court order confirming the infringement and imposing site blocking measures on the ISPs, who are content providers as well.”

In common with earlier blocking cases elsewhere in Europe, the ISPs named in the case (Brutélé, Nethys, Proximus, Telenet) first want confirmation that the sites they’re being asked to block are acting illegally. That is the stated purpose of the BEA lawsuit.

“Site blocking is nothing new in Belgium. The Pirate Bay and Popcorn Time – which are not involved in the current action – have been blocked for a long time,” Maeterlinck continues.

“Studies and figures from abroad (e.g. UK, Portugal) have shown that site blocking has a positive impact on the legal offer while the visits to the blocked sites drop massively (approximately a 90% drop in Belgium with The Pirate Bay) and the overall piracy level decreases as well.

“Site blocking actions are effective and if we want to support the continuing development of the legal offer and increase consumer confidence in the online economy, these enforcement initiatives need to be continued,” Maeterlinck concludes.

In the UK, well over a thousand domains are blocked on copyright grounds and in Portugal, where a voluntary mechanism is in place, the current tally is more than 900.

Next door to Belgium in the Netherlands, the blocking process has been much more drawn out. Rather than being largely compliant, ISPs have dug in their heels and objected at every turn after being asked to block The Pirate Bay. That case was referred to the European Court of Justice and it will eventually fall to the Dutch Supreme Court to make a decision.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 02/06/17

lundi 6 février 2017 à 09:11

arrival-torrentsThis week we have four newcomers in our chart.

Arrival is the most downloaded movie.

The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are Web-DL/Webrip/HDRip/BDrip/DVDrip unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

This week’s most downloaded movies are:
Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrents
1 (2) Arrival 8.3 / trailer
2 (…) Passengers (Subbed HDrip) 7.1 / trailer
3 (1) Doctor Strange (DVDScr) 8.0 / trailer
4 (2) La La Land (DVDscr) 8.8 / trailer
5 (6) Jack Reacher: Never Go Back 6.3 / trailer
6 (…) Resident Evil: The Final Chapter (HDTS) 6.3 / trailer
7 (4) Hacksaw Ridge (DVDscr) 8.5 / trailer
8 (7) Manchester By The Sea (DVDscr) 8.3 / trailer
9 (…) Lion (DVDscr) 8.0 / trailer
10 (…) The Founder (DVDscr) 7.3 / trailer

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.