PROJET AUTOBLOG


TorrentFreak

Archivé

Site original : TorrentFreak

⇐ retour index

Steal This Show S01E06: Revolutionizing Hollywood

mardi 16 février 2016 à 08:41

steal240This special episode features Lance Weiler – writer, director & experience designer. Lance is the creator of movies The Last Broadcast (1998) and Head Trauma (2005). WIRED magazine named him ‘one of 25 people helping to re-invent entertainment and change the face of Hollywood.’

As well as zooming through Lance’s career, Jamie and Lance discuss how digital distribution revolutionized indie filmmaking, while filmmakers resisted it; how Lance sees piracy as a positive; the challenges for discovery and attention when everyone’s a creator; and how to hijack Sherlock Holmes.

Steal This Show aims to release bi-weekly episodes featuring insiders discussing copyright and file-sharing news. It complements our regular reporting by adding more room for opinion, commentary and analysis.

The guests for our news discussions will vary and we’ll aim to introduce voices from different backgrounds and persuasions. In addition to news, STS will also produce features interviewing some of the great innovators and minds.

Host: Jamie King

Guess: Lance Weiler.

Produced by Jamie King
Edited & Mixed by Eric Bouthiller
Original Music by David Triana
Web Production by Siraje Amarniss

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Cox Refuses to Spy on Subscribers to Catch Pirates

lundi 15 février 2016 à 19:50

cox-logoLast December a Virginia federal jury ruled that Internet provider Cox Communications was responsible for the copyright infringements of its subscribers.

The ISP was found guilty of willful contributory copyright infringement and must pay music publisher BMG Rights Management $25 million in damages.

The verdict was a massive victory for the music company and a disaster for Cox, but the case is not closed yet.

A few weeks ago BMG asked the court to issue a permanent injunction against Cox Communications, requiring the Internet provider to terminate the accounts of pirating subscribers and share their details with the copyright holder.

In addition BMG wants the Internet provider to take further action to prevent infringements on its network. While the company remained vague on the specifics, it mentioned the option of using invasive deep packet inspection technology.

Last Friday, Cox filed a reply pointing out why BMG’s demands go too far, rejecting the suggestion of broad spying and account termination without due process.

“To the extent the injunction requires either termination or surveillance, it imposes undue hardships on Cox, both because the order is vague and because it imposes disproportionate, intrusive, and punitive measures against households and businesses with no due process,” Cox writes (pdf).

For one, Cox believes that the proposed injunction is vague. It doesn’t specify what a repeat infringer is and ignores false positives or other complicating situations.

“What if, for example, the subscriber’s computer was infected with malware, the user’s network password was stolen, or a neighbor or guest accessed the user’s account? BMG’s motion and proposed order are silent on these critical questions,” Cox writes.

The Internet provider also rejects the mass-surveillance suggestion. Aside from it being a privacy violation, Cox says it can’t identify and block individual files its subscribers send.

While some measures can be taken to detect overall BitTorrent traffic, its tools can’t easily pinpoint pirated content flowing through its network.

“The evidence at trial showed that Cox cannot use deep packet inspection or other tools to police its users’ activities because surveillance to detect the contents of user transmissions is likely illegal,” Cox writes.

“The evidence showed that Cox does not track where users go on the Internet; that Cox does not know what content passes over its system, and that Cox cannot identify, much less block, which files a subscriber accesses or shares using BitTorrent,” they add.

The spying element is not the only privacy invasion, according to Cox. The copyright holder also asked for the injunction to require the ISP to hand over the personal details of copyright infringers.

Cox notes that this request clearly violates the DMCA. In addition, it threatens the public interest by exposing personal details of subscribers to an “abuser” such as the piracy settlement outfit Rightscorp.

“BMG’s proposed injunction threatens the public interest. It blindly punishes consumers by terminating their Internet access based on mere accusations, invading their privacy, and forcing them into a relationship with known abuser Rightscorp.”

Taking the above into account, Cox is asking the court to deny the proposed injunction, or limit it so it would not require any monitoring or the handing over of private subscriber details.

The court will now review the request from both sides and is expected to rule on the matter during the weeks to come.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Kodi Announces Legal Action to Smash Piracy Links

lundi 15 février 2016 à 11:45

Over the past several years the Kodi media player has grown to become one of the most-used pieces of software through which people can stream, download and otherwise obtain copyright infringing content.

While millions have heard of BitTorrent, living rooms around the world are now more likely to have a device running Kodi, largely due to how easily the software is run on smart-enabled TVs.

Interestingly, the companies behind both BitTorrent and Kodi have a similar problem. Through the actions of their users, both sets of developers are up to their necks in piracy-related news and both would prefer not to be since neither has done anything illegal.

BitTorrent Inc. has made huge efforts on the PR front to try and educate the masses, with limited effect. Now Team Kodi say they will do the same but if the early signs are a prediction of the future, this will be a tough challenge.

The problem in a nutshell

Kodi is just a media player, it carries no content. However, Kodi has the ability to run third party plugins that in many instances make infringing content available to the user. So, when people load Kodi with plugins recommended by a friend and then see the latest movies listed, they believe that Kodi – and the people behind Kodi – are the ones providing them with the movies.

Needless to say, for Team Kodi this is a huge problem. Not only are they already wrongly associated with huge amounts of infringing activity, the installed addons often break or do not function as advertised. When users get problems they head off to the Kodi forums and vent – to entirely the wrong people.

kodi-piracy

“Every day a new user shows up on the Kodi forum, totally unaware that the free movies they’re watching have been pirated and surprised to discover that Kodi itself isn’t providing those movies,” says XBMC Foundation President and Kodi Product Manager Nathan Betzen.

But while those who install Kodi on their own machines and obtain the addons themselves probably understand that Team Kodi isn’t to blame for their piracy, there are countless thousands – maybe millions – of people out there who are entirely clueless.

That’s because they are buying hardware devices from places such as eBay and Amazon with Kodi ready set-up with potentially infringing third party addons.

More often than not, these products are advertised as “fully loaded” and less subtly as “Powered by Kodi”. The latter infuriates Team Kodi, especially when the devices fail to operate as promised.

kodi-piracy1

“There have been a wave of sellers who decided to make a quick buck modifying Kodi, installing broken piracy add-ons, advertising that Kodi let’s you watch free movies and TV, and then vanishing when the user buys the box and finds out that the add-on they were sold on was a crummy, constantly breaking mess,” Betzen explains.

“These sellers are dragging users into the world of piracy without their knowledge and at the same time convincing new users that Kodi is a buggy mess, because they never differentiate Kodi from 3rd party add-ons.”

By now there are millions of Kodi users and although its difficult if not impossible to put numbers on them, it’s probably fair to assume that the majority are using the software for piracy. So what can the Kodi team possibly do?

Bring out the trademark banhammer

Well, the team has a plan which involves dissociating the Kodi name from infringing acts. The XBMC Foundation owns the ‘Kodi’ trademark and is legally entitled to chase down people who use it without permission.

kodi-trademark

They announced an intention to do so in 2014 but it appears things have gotten so bad since that core Kodi developers have threatened to quit unless something more aggressive is done.

“This means we will issue trademark takedown notices anywhere we think the likelihood for confusion is high. If you are selling a box on your website designed to trick users into thinking broken add-ons come from us and work perfectly, so you can make a buck, we’re going to do everything we can to stop you,” Betzen warns.

“If you are making a video in which you claim to be a Kodi developer or Kodi team member or you are just using the Kodi name while assuring users that some pirate add-on is totally legal and isn’t going to break next week, we will do everything we can to take you down.”

That’s right. Team Kodi aren’t just going to target sellers of piracy-configured boxes, but even people putting up YouTube videos that use the Kodi trademark without permission.

“Most of all, we are tired of a thousand different salesmen and Youtubers making money off ruining our name. And there are even more people out there seeking to make a quick buck by selling ads on videos about getting free movies and TV while using Kodi in their channel name to make their content seem official, as if those videos are coming from us.”

There has already been vigorous debate in the Kodi forums over how far the team will be prepared to go, with suggestions that even people monetizing “Kodi tips” could become a target.

kodi-piracy2

Only time will tell how this will play out, but the Kodi team are under no illusions that this is a huge task. To that end they’re enrolling supporters to help them with their trademark offensive against both sellers and YouTubers.

“If you see somebody selling a box that’s ‘fully loaded’ or comes with the phrase ‘Free movies and TV with Kodi,’ please, ask them to stop. And let us know. It’s OK to sell a vanilla Kodi box. It’s OK to sell a fully loaded box that doesn’t have Kodi installed or fully rebrands Kodi to something else entirely. It is not OK to sell a fully loaded Kodi box,” the team clarify.

“If you see a Youtuber using the Kodi logo as part of his channel, constantly marketing Kodi as a source of free movies, ask him to stop pretending to be us and dragging our name through the muck. And, of course, let us know. Who knows, maybe the Youtuber has no idea that he or she is causing so many problems and a conversation might solve them.”

Interestingly, while Team Kodi are clearly sick of being connected to piracy, they aren’t actually condemning what the user does.

“Team Kodi maintains an officially neutral stance on what users do with their own software. Kodi is open source software, and as long as the GPL is followed, you are welcome to do with it as you like,” Betzen explains.

“So while we don’t love this use of Kodi, as long as you know what illegal and potentially dangerous things you are getting yourself into and accept the fact that the Team will not be providing you with any support, then you are welcome to do what you like.”

There’s no doubt that the Kodi team has a mountain to climb and at this point it seems unlikely they will ever truly get to the top. That being said, it will be interesting to see them try as this is a unique situation that few have ever faced before.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 02/15/16

lundi 15 février 2016 à 09:14

creed1This week we have one newcomer in our chart.

Creed, which came out as BluRay rip this week, is the most downloaded movie.

The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are BD/DVDrips unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

Ranking (last week) Movie IMDb Rating / Trailer
torrentfreak.com
1 (7) Creed 8.0 / trailer
2 (1) Ride Along 2 5.8 / trailer
3 (2) The Big Short (DVDscr) 8.1 / trailer
4 (3) Spectre 7.9 / trailer
5 (10) The Good Dinosaur 6.9 / trailer
6 (4) The Revenant (DVDscr) ?.? / trailer
7 (…) The Forest 5.1 / trailer
8 (6) The Martian 8.2 / trailer
9 (5) Kung Fu Panda 3 (Telesync) 8.0 / trailer
10 (9) The Intern 7.4 / trailer

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

U.S. ISPs and Rightsholders Work on Improved Anti-Piracy Measures

dimanche 14 février 2016 à 20:51

pirate-runningDuring the summer of 2011 the MPAA and RIAA teamed up with five major Internet providers in the United States, announcing their a plan to “educate” BitTorrent pirates.

The parties launched the Center for Copyright Information (CCI) and agreed on a system through which Internet account holders are warned if their connections are used to download pirated content.

After five or six warnings ISPs take a variety of repressive measures, including bandwidth throttling and temporary disconnections.

The system has been in place for several years now and last summer the agreement was set to expire. However, the CCI informs TorrentFreak that the program will continue and earlier this month it was extended again until March 22.

This is a relatively short extension, suggesting that the parties are close to a new agreement. However, CCI was not able to confirm this.

“While this extension is shorter than prior extensions, it is still a matter of routine business that will allow us to maintain the program as we work together to refine the system,” a spokesperson informed us.

cciext

The negotiations have been ongoing for months so it’s clear that the new deal will include some changes. We can only speculate what these are, but it would be no surprise if the MPAA and RIAA have asked for more serious consequences for repeat infringers.

Under the current system a user will no longer receive any warnings after the 6th copyright alert, and permanent disconnections are not part of the program.

This made sense five years ago when the original terms were negotiated. However, just a few weeks ago Cox Communications was held liable for pirating customers because they failed to terminate their accounts, which puts the old agreement in a new light.

There has also been explicit critique from some copyright holders. A few months ago several independent movies studios called for an end to the “six strikes” scheme, describing it as an ineffective “sham”.

According to the movie studios the copyright alerts are highly ineffective because only a small fraction of the piracy notices are forwarded to the Internet providers.

Time will tell whether any of the upcoming changes will address these concerns.

For CCI, however, the core task remains educating consumers and shifting norms and behavior, pointing them towards legal sites and services.

“The members of CCI are committed to this voluntary effort to educate consumers about copyright and how they can access and enjoy digital content. We are proof positive that collaboration can work, and we are excited about the future of the organization,” CCI’s spokesperson says.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.