PROJET AUTOBLOG


TorrentFreak

Archivé

Site original : TorrentFreak

⇐ retour index

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week

lundi 25 novembre 2013 à 08:48

prisonersThis week we have two newcomers in our chart.

Prisoners is the most downloaded movie.

The data for our weekly download chart is collected by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are BD/DVDrips unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

Week ending November 24, 2013
Ranking (last week) Movie IMDb Rating / Trailer
torrentfreak.com
1 (3) Prisoners 8.1 / trailer
2 (1) Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters 6.4 / trailer
3 (2) Elysium 7.0 / trailer
4 (5) Red 2 6.9 / trailer
5 (4) The Wolverine 6.9 / trailer
6 (…) Drinking Buddies 6.2 / trailer
7 (6) 2 Guns 7.4 / trailer
8 (8) We’re The Millers 7.1 / trailer
9 (10) Machete Kills 6.1 / trailer
10 (…) Thor: The Dark World (Cam) 7.6 / trailer

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing and VPN services.

Kim Dotcom Links €20,000 Wikileaks Donation to Megaupload Raid

dimanche 24 novembre 2013 à 19:53

dotcombookFew people would disagree that Kim Dotcom is a fascinating man. After his file-sharing service Megaupload was raided early 2012, Kim Dotcom became an instant Internet celebrity.

The success and controversy surrounding Megaupload as well as Dotcom’s personal life in the years leading up to the raid are now detailed in a biography.

Written by David Fisher, “The Secret Life of Kim Dotcom – Spies, Lies and the War for the Internet” reveals intimate family details, but it also provides additional details on Dotcom’s perception of the Megaupload raid, and how the entertainment industry dealt with the site before it was taken down.

Some of these details are being published for the first time, including Kim Dotcom’s suspicions that his support for Wikileaks was one of the main reasons for the U.S. Government to go after him.

In the book Dotcom explains that he donated €20,000 to Wikileaks after the Collateral Murder video came out early 2010. It’s a controversial allegation, but Dotcom believes that it is no coincidence that the prosecutor who investigated Julian Assange was also appointed to the Megaupload case.

The passage below is taken directly from the book, with permission from the publisher.

The Wikileaks Connection

Dotcom believes one of the reasons he was targeted was his support for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. He says he was compelled to reach out to the site after US soldier Bradley Manning leaked documents to it. The infamous video recording of the Apache gunship gunning down a group of Iraqis (some of whom, despite widespread belief to the contrary, were later revealed to have been armed), including two Reuters journalists, was the trigger.

“Wow, this is really crazy,” Dotcom recalls thinking, watching the black-and-white footage and hearing the operators of the helicopter chat about firing on the group. He made a €20,000 donation to Wikileaks through Megaupload’s UK account. “That was one of the largest donations they got,” he says. According to Dotcom, the US, at the time, was monitoring Wikileaks and trying better to understand its support base. “My name must have popped right up.”

The combination of a leaking culture and a website dedicated to producing leaked material would horrify the US government, he says. A willing leaker and a platform on which to do it was “their biggest enemy and their biggest fear . . . If you are in a corrupt government and you know how much fishy stuff is going on in the background, to you, that is the biggest threat — to have a site where people can anonymously submit documents.”

Neil MacBride was appointed to the Wikileaks case, meaning Dotcom shares prosecutors with Assange. “I think the Wikileaks connection got me on the radar.”

Dotcom believes the US was most scared of the threat of inspiration Wikileaks posed. He also believes it shows just how many secrets the US has hidden from the public and the rest of the world. “That’s why they are going after that so hard. Only a full transparent government will have no corruption and no back door deals or secret organisations or secret agreements. The US is the complete opposite of that. It is really difficult to get any information in the US, so whistleblowing is the one way you can get to information and provide information to the public.”

The book doesn’t offer more details to substantiate Dotcom’s claims, but it’s clear that the New Zealand entrepreneur sees Megaupload’s takedown as more than just “a favor” to Hollywood and the major record labels.

In addition to the Wikileaks angle the book also describes tense pre-raid relationships between Megaupload and various copyright holders. As Dotcom previously told TorrentFreak, several players in the entertainment industry, including Disney, were eager to partner with the file-sharing empire.

On the other hand, however, the major record labels and Hollywood also actively frustrated attempts by Dotcom to license content for his Megabox and Megamovie ventures. The passage below describes the tense relationship in detail.

Tense Relationships With Big Content

While Hollywood executives railed against the company in public, they were privately finding ways to engage with the business. There were emails from studios, looking for ways to work with Megaupload that would see their content hosted on the website. “Disney proposed to us a contract of co-operation where there were some conditions in there we simply couldn’t accept. They wanted to use us as a distribution platform (but) they just had completely bizarre ideas of how that would work. They would basically take control of the whole process.”

Ideas from the studios included allowing old or little-known new content to find its own life on Megaupload. The old content could be linked to new content which would be paid for, while new artists with low public profile would be able to build a fan base through viral appeal. “For us it was bizarre, on the one hand, they were like wanting to do something with us and being nice and thanking us for all the co-operation. You would never think they would go and try and start criminal action against us.”

Dotcom said he struggled to understand why Hollywood and the record Industry Association of America spent so much effort on attack when there were easier ways to manage the evolution of copyright on the internet. An outlay of up to $2 million would fund the development of a call centre — he suggested India or the Philippines. “You employ say 50 to 100 people, and you train them to look for infringing links all over the internet.” The centre would develop search skills ranging from the ubiquitous google to sites dedicated to infringing content. He said with the funding of “a relatively small investment” and the use of available tools like the Digital Millennium copyright Act “they could have sorted this piracy problem out”.

In the months leading up to the destruction of Megaupload, there was a growing friction between it and the copyright industry. Megaupload was bigger and bolder than ever, talking of new business plans which cut across territory considered by the copyright industry to be traditionally theirs. One of those ventures was MegaMovie, intended to be an online database of films. There was also MegaBox, the proposed music site which would allow users to buy tracks from popular artists — but also allow artists to sell directly to the public.

“I was having meetings with Hollywood producers trying to establish communication and trying to work with them. I wanted to license content for MegaBox from the music labels.”For each move Dotcom made, the copyright industry would make another to head him off. When Megaupload agreed a deal with a company which held the database of cover art for CDs, the deal was sunk by the recording industry. “They stopped us from becoming a proper licensor of their content and their cover art. They didn’t even allow us to become a partner.”

While Hollywood was keeping the eager Mega team at arm’s length, Dotcom could only see common sense in some sort of deal. He wanted to turn the infringing links into an opportunity to make money, diverting traffic attempting to download infringing material to an MPAA-approved website where they could buy it. “We had great ideas for them,” said Dotcom. “So let’s say Hollywood identifies the Terminator 2 movie. Their team has taken it down from Megaupload. By providing us with a content ID . . . we know what it was and we link to the site where they sell it legitimately. They weren’t interested in that — can you believe that? We were going to give them so much traffic so they could sell this stuff and they didn’t do it.”

Perhaps one of the reasons why Hollywood and the RIAA kept Megaupload at a distance is because they knew what was coming. Not much later Megaupload was raided, effectively destroying a multi-million dollar empire.

The above are just a few highlights from the book, which is well worth a read for those who want to know more about Dotcom’s life. While the book doesn’t delve deeply into some of the more controversial issues, it is a fascinating read.

“The Secret Life of Kim Dotcom – Spies, Lies and the War for the Internet” is available for sale here, and an Ebook version is available on Amazon.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing and VPN services.

How to Unblock Websites For Free and Why it Feels Good

dimanche 24 novembre 2013 à 10:59

wetpaintHave you ever noticed that when someone tells you what to do – or what not to do – you have a somewhat natural tendency to go against their instructions?

In psychology it’s called ‘reactance’ and is something which occurs when we believe that someone’s orders, mechanisms, rules or regulations are about to narrow our options or limit our behavioral freedoms.

I love incredibly hot sauce (such as Dave’s Insanity Ghost Pepper Sauce) even though it leaves me bent up in pain if I have too much, which incidentally is anything more than a few drops. On the label of these sauces it often orders you NEVER, EVER under ANY circumstances to consume the sauce neat.

Yeah, right.

The problem is that there is something inherently annoying about someone we don’t know trying to impose their will on us when we are perfectly capable of making our own decisions. Not only do we inexplicably want the forbidden item even more than before, we kick back and build up resentment against those attempting to restrict our freedoms.

For example, I’ve never commented on a YouTube video before but the idea that Google wants to force Plus down our necks in order for us to do so fills me with rage, to the point where i’ve even signed the petition.

All kinds of Internet restriction has this effect on me. Every time news breaks that another site has been blocked I have an overwhelming desire to make sure I can still access it, even though I may never have visited it in the past and have no intention of doing so in the future.

That said, once the “This Site Has Been Blocked” message appears there’s nothing more immediately satisfying than unblocking it, a feeling that parallels the challenging of “don’t touch, wet paint” when it turns out to be dry after all.

The good news is that satisfaction is just a few clicks away for anyone who wants it and it doesn’t have to cost a penny either. Here are a few of the most simple solutions that will take a maximum of five to ten minutes for a novice to setup.

PirateBrowser

PirateBrowser is a simple tool provided by the operators of The Pirate Bay. It allows anyone to quickly and simply circumvent ISP and government web blocking.

The software is Tor-based and includes a version of the popular Firefox browser which should be used when a site needs to be unblocked. By mid October the tool had achieved around one million downloads and according to Alexa is most popular among users in South Korea.

PirateBrowser can be downloaded here

Tor

Tor is perhaps the most famous tool to unblock websites, avoid censorship and maintain privacy. It was originally designed and implemented by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory for protecting government communications.

Today it used by people such as whistleblowers, journalists and activists who may need to keep their identities secret. It is also used by those looking to access censored webpages, hence its inclusion in this list.

Tor can be downloaded here

Virtual Private Networks – VPN

vpngate3A VPN is a group of computers networked over the top of the world’s largest network – the Internet. Communications are encrypted so VPNs are useful for maintaining privacy and, of course, unblocking blocked websites.

There can be no doubt that paying a few dollars per month for a premium account is the best option for those who have the money, but basic and completely free options are available.

Perhaps the most interesting one is offered by the Graduate School of University of Tsukuba, Japan. The VPN Gate Academic Experiment Project launched earlier this year aiming “to expand the knowledge of Global Distributed Public VPN Relay Servers.”

Like all technologies listed in this article, it’s not necessary for beginners to understand how they work, just that they do. Unlike Tor, don’t expect total privacy with VPN Gate but be assured that the service unblocks websites just fine.

VPN Gate can be downloaded here.

Site-Specific Reverse Proxies

In the wake of the censorship of torrent sites in the UK, the Netherlands, Italy, Denmark and other countries around Europe, special sites started to appear. Known as ‘reverse proxies’, these webpages access blocked sites and feed the content back to their own pages. To visitors accessing the reverse proxy, the blocked site appears as normal.

There are hundreds of these available, such as the selection available on PirateReverse.info and Come.in. However, some reverse proxies themselves have become subjected to censorship, meaning that they too are blocked at the ISP level, in the UK, the Netherlands and Belgium.

General Web Proxies

General webpage proxies are sites which can unblock most websites online via a simple interface. By simply entering the URL of the blocked website into the search box of the web proxy, the blocked site will become accessible.

There are hundreds of these web-based solutions which can be uncovered by a simple Google search, although some are overloaded with adverts and cluttered interfaces.

On the plus side they’re all free so have a browse around and find one you like. Some are available as a browser extension, which makes them even easier to use.

Conclusion

You are hereby ordered NOT to try any of these solutions – EVER – and if you have any of your own solutions you will REFRAIN from posting them in the comments section below.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing and VPN services.

Why Even Doctor Who Has Trouble Following Copyright

samedi 23 novembre 2013 à 20:00

doctorwhoLast month, a post on Slashdot suggested that the early episodes of Dr Who will soon fall into the public domain.

But in copyright nothing is ever so simple. In fact, even a TimeLord’s brain, capable of dealing with the intricacies of time and space, would find it a complex subject.

At the heart of the assertion is that in the New Year the first episodes of Dr Who will fall into the public domain. However, the reality isn’t as clear-cut as it seems. While the broadcast copyright will expire, the other copyrights in the episode will still exist. This means that the broadcast may well fall into the public domain but the episode itself won’t.

Under the UK’s 1956 Copyright Act, broadcast copyright expires 50 years from the end of the year when a show was first broadcast. This means that the first six episodes (the four comprising An Unearthly Child – the first story – as well as the first two of the seven episodes in The Daleks) will expire 50 years from the end of 1963, on January 1 2014.

However, the episode as a whole won’t be in the public domain. That’s a whole lot more complex.

Copyrights for the episodes themselves expire at the end of the year that is 70 years after the death of the following persons, whichever comes last:

- The principal director
- The author of the screenplay
- The author of the dialog, or
- The composer of music specially created for and used in the film

Since the director of the first four episodes, Waris Hussein, is still alive, the 70 year clock hasn’t even started. Likewise, Christopher Barry, the director of the majority of the Dalek’s episodes, is also still alive. So we’re looking at 1 January 2085 as a realistic earliest date (assuming neither die in the next month, and they’re the last surviving).

Legal blogger William Tovey has done some investigation on the topic and found that the earliest definitive date an episode drops into the public domain will be The Aztecs (the sixth story of season 1) in 2083. However, if (still living) script-editor Donald Tosh didn’t contribute to the dialogue, then The Time Meddler (season 2, story 9) will beat it into the public domain in 2057, followed by The Smugglers (season 4 opener) in 2068.

And this is where even the Gallifreyan brain goes crazy.

Ninety-four years before the first Doctor Who episode drops into the public domain in the UK is just nuts, and that’s not the actual first episode. That will have been under copyright for at least 130 years before entering the public domain. And this all depends on the term not being extended again.

Worse, this is only for the UK. Copyrights in every other country will be calculated using their own systems and timescales, and one is left with the belief that the real reason time travel was invented concerned perpetual copyright.

So while people in the UK will be able to share the broadcasts come January 1, in order to do anything more they’ll need to wait at least 45 years, while people in other countries will have to run the gauntlet of their own local copyright laws.

The complexity and extended term length is enough to drive anyone interested in honesty and fairness crazy. It’s a no-brainer to suggest that a paragon of virtue like the Doctor, more interested in doing right than following the letter of the law, would have real trouble following copyright law as it’s currently written around the world.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing and VPN services.

Pirate Bay Founder’s Imminent Extradition Raises Big Questions

samedi 23 novembre 2013 à 11:29

In June 2013, authorities in Denmark requested the extradition of Gottfrid Svartholm following accusations that he was involved in hacking into a Danish company.

Their request would have to wait, however, pending the outcome of a parallel hacking case against The Pirate Bay founder in Sweden.

In the event Gottfrid was found guilty and handed two years in jail, but on appeal that was reduced to 12 months when it was decided that his involvement in a breach at the Nordea bank could not be proven.

This outcome was important. In the Nordea case the court found that although Gottfrid’s computer had been used in the hack, it was possible it had been remotely controlled. This doubt led to an acquittal and the sparking of new hope as the case in Denmark involved the same computer during the same time period in a similar case.

With this in mind, last month Gottrid filed a last-ditch appeal at the Supreme Court in Sweden. It was a failed exercise and as a result Gottfrid faces extradition to Denmark where he is accused of hacking into the mainframe computers of IT company CSC.

Speaking with TorrentFreak, Gottfrid’s mother Kristina says that while the similarities in the cases are obvious, the Danish police appear to have other things on their minds.

“The Danish police have shown a significantly greater interest in what a person mentioned by name and called ‘Swedish police’ in the documents has had to say about the computer and its remote control possibilities,” Kristina says. “According to his person, Gottfrid’s computer could not have been remotely controlled.”

This, of course, is completely the opposite of the conclusion arrived at by the Court of Appeal.

Furthermore, Kristina says that the person from the Swedish Security Police told Danish authorities that Gottfrid used the nickname “My Evil Twin”, yet that name has never appeared in the Swedish investigation or in another situation related to him.

“This ‘nick’ is given, however, such a distinction in the investigation that it is even to be found in a separate heading, along with the two names that are familiar from the Swedish investigation, ‘Anakata’ and ‘tLt’. The basis for this? Well, the name was found in a file in the computer. And, according to the person from Säpo, the computer could not have been used by someone else. And therefore that nickname must be Gottfrid’s,” Kristina explains.

Notably, the Säpo employee was also the person who originally tipped off Danish police about the intrusion made against CSC. That tipoff led to the issuing of an arrest warrant for Gottfrid on the basis that he had sabotaged and caused “the extensive disruption of information systems,” but up until this point they had no idea that there was anything wrong.

But even though the Danish authorities still believe they have a strong case that warrants extradition, it is interesting that up until now no indictment has appeared.

“The documentation that the Danish police have presented to Gottfrid is, in his own words, extremely thin. Time has passed and no indictment has yet been presented. But the demand for extradition remains,” Kristina explains.

There are other problems too. In the documents seen by Kristina the Danish police’s case against Gottfrid references the ‘guilty’ judgment handed down by the District Court earlier in the year but of course that was later repealed by the Court of Appeal. There is no mention of the acquittal.

“[The police] obviously do not want to let the Danish court take note of this assessment of the remote control of the computer. If they did the suspicions against Gottfrid would fall,” Kristina explains.

In correspondence with the Danish prosecutor in September, Kristina was informed that the authorities do not intend to take note of the Court of Appeal ruling, despite any similarities in the cases. As a result Gottfrid will be sent to Denmark next week where he will likely be imprisoned for many months before he faces trial. If he had remained in Sweden he would have been free by the end of the year, a point not lost on his mother.

“Is this all about keeping Gottfrid locked up as long as possible, regardless of cost, human and financial?” she questions. “Why, in that case? To punish him? In order to set an example?”

If convicted in Denmark, Gottfrid faces up to six years in jail.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing and VPN services.