PROJET AUTOBLOG


TorrentFreak

Archivé

Site original : TorrentFreak

⇐ retour index

Game of Thrones Piracy Peaks After Season Finale

lundi 27 juin 2016 à 16:00

got6Traditionally, the Game of Thrones season finale is among the most viewed episodes of the season, also on pirate sites.

With the Internet abuzz over the latest plot twists and turns, many people turned to torrent sites to grab a pirated copy of the show.

The first episodes appeared online shortly after the official broadcast ended and at the time of writing more than 350,000 people are actively sharing a copy. This is the highest number we’ve seen this year.

Data gathered by TorrentFreak estimates that after just eight hours, well over a million people have already downloaded the final episode of this season via BitTorrent. Millions more are expected to follow during the days to come.

The most popular release is currently an HD version of little over a gigabyte. This is different from previous years, when SD copies were consistently the most downloaded of all.

While the demand is significant, there is no all time “swarm record” to report. Also, the overall download numbers appear to be roughly on par with previous years, perhaps a bit lower.

Although it’s too early to jump to conclusions, there are a few explanations why Game of Thrones piracy might no longer be growing, via torrents at least.

For one, the number of legal alternatives have been growing steadily in recent years. Also, the same is true for “unauthorized” streaming sites where people can view pirated copies of Game of Thrones episodes instantly.

Another factor may be that HBO significantly cranked up its enforcement efforts this year. As a result, it is quite hard, or impossible, to find recent Game of Thrones episodes on some popular torrent sites.

The “disappearing” torrents also lead to scattered swarms, making it harder to break the previous record. Time will tell how this apparent trend develops during the years to come.

That said, it is worth keeping in mind that interest in the show still dwarfs the competition. This means that there is little doubt that it will be crowned the most downloaded TV show for the fifth year in a row.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

If Extradited, How Might Kim Dotcom Be Treated in the US?

lundi 27 juin 2016 à 11:02

nommFollowing the massive raids on Megaupload and its operators in January 2012, there are few signs that the case is progressing at anything greater than a glacial pace.

Notably, Kim Dotcom and his former business associates continue to live in New Zealand despite efforts by authorities in the United States to have them extradited to face trial.

Dotcom is clear, however. Every time there is a push to tighten the noose, the entrepreneur fights back. This will not be a battle easily won by either side, and the Megaupload founder is as determined as ever to maintain his comfortable and privileged life.

But consider for a moment if it all went wrong. Imagine the final, final appeal fails and an order is handed down for Dotcom to be extradited to the United States. How might that play out?

Thus far, former Megaupload programmer Andrus Nõmm is the only person from the case to have faced justice in the United States. He was sentenced to a year and a day after traveling voluntarily to the United States last year.

In all, Nõmm served just over ten months, a sentence dwarfed by the five decades or more faced by Kim Dotcom. But despite the comparatively short time inside, the 37-year-old Estonian says his experience was still pretty miserable.

In an interview with Estonian journalist Toivo Tänavsuu just republished in English by Ars Technica, Nõmm says that things were bad from the outset.

“I was held in a detention center for a few weeks, and that was worse than prison. You share a closed room which is maybe two by three meters, and you only get out for six to seven hours a day. There are no beds. You only get a 3-4 centimeter thick piece of polyurethane foam which you can lay down on the concrete floor,” Nõmm says.

While Kim Dotcom was held in prison in New Zealand following his arrest in 2012, conditions were better than this. Nutritionally, markedly so.

“They gave us enough [food] so that we didn’t die. I was starving all the time,” Nõmm reveals. “There were three or four different menus with a list of different things: hamburgers, meatloaf, steak. But no matter what you asked for, they always brought you a tiny, bland burger.”

But accommodation woes were only the beginning. The Estonian says that when he appeared in court in Virginia, the agreement he’d signed with the U.S. before departing his former home in the Netherlands had been lost.

“I actually had to sign a paper with counts to which I hadn’t confessed — for example, the claim that I knew that Megaupload was earning millions. We signed the new agreement half an hour before the hearing. They used very specific English in court, but nobody was interested in whether I needed an interpreter or not,” he says.

As Nõmm set off to serve his year in prison, he did so on a bus, in shackles.

“You don’t get any food, you can’t go to the toilet, and sometimes you drive for 12 hours straight,” he says.

“They never send you straight to where you’re going. You drive through a number of other prisons first. If you make trouble, say by complaining to the judge that your rights are being violated, you’re put through this thing called ‘diesel therapy.’ They bounce you back and forth between prisons like a ping-pong ball.”

The Megaupload programmer was on the bus for 16 hours, stopping off en route for a 10-day stay in a supermax prison and eventually landing at Moshannon Valley prison in Pennsylvania.

“The prisoners were in barracks, 80 men to a block. There were five buildings altogether, each of them with six blocks like some kind of big hospital. Most of the inmates did sports. I wasn’t interested in body-building or getting tattoos. I just walked around for hours or read,” Nõmm says.

“I read a lot, four or five books a week. I scribbled some plans and specifications for my projects, or watched stupid American TV series. I took Spanish and Chinese courses. Not much of either stuck, but at least it took up my time.”

While Moshannon Valley is a lower-risk facility, it certainly wasn’t a walk in the park. Nõmm says that everybody had to work for at least 20 hours each week “unclogging the toilets, digging pits, painting, or helping sort the books” and for this the inmates were paid 12 cents per hour. For scale, a pack of coffee cost $4.

Nõmm survived his ordeal and says that prison hasn’t changed him. Notably, however, he has nothing good to say about Kim Dotcom, despite the Megaupload founder giving him a job and openly supporting the Estonian on Twitter.

“[Dotcom] is only saying that to make himself look better. He even tried to go into politics in New Zealand to win the elections and change the law so they couldn’t extradite him,” Nõmm says.

“He understands that social media has a massive influence. Civil war within Megaupload isn’t in his best interests. He’s this martyr, this freedom fighter.”

With Nõmm’s sentence served, he’s now a free man and can largely put his Megaupload ordeal behind him. Kim Dotcom cannot say the same and Nõmm believes that authorities in the United States will ultimately get their hands on him.

“He’ll eventually end up in the US. He’ll most likely throw everyone under the bus. Kim’s only interested in Kim,” he concludes.

Whatever happens next, Dotcom won’t want to spend fifty minutes in a U.S. prison, let alone 50 years. He’ll spend every penny he has left to stop that from happening, but this is just the beginning.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 06/27/16

lundi 27 juin 2016 à 08:47

batsupsThis week we have three newcomers in our chart.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is the most downloaded movie.

The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are Web-DL/Webrip/HDRip/BDrip/DVDrip unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

Ranking (last week) Movie IMDb Rating / Trailer
torrentfreak.com
1 (…) Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice 7.0 / trailer
2 (1) Warcraft (TS/TC) 7.7 / trailer
3 (…) Finding Dory (HDTS) 8.1 / trailer
4 (2) The Huntsman: Winter’s War 6.2 / trailer
5 (4) Whiskey Tango Foxtrot 6.8 / trailer
6 (…) Hardcore Henry 6.9 / trailer
7 (3) X-Men: Apocalypse (HDCam/TC) 7.7 / trailer
8 (5) Eye In The Sky 7.6 / trailer
9 (…) Allegiant 5.9 / trailer
10 (6) Zootopia 8.3 / trailer

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Help! My VPN Provider Is Compromised By a Gag Order!

dimanche 26 juin 2016 à 20:24

proxyshMillions of Internet users around the world use a VPN to protect their privacy online. One of the key benefits is that it hides one’s true IP-address from third-party monitoring outfits, countering a lot of unwanted snooping.

However, law enforcement is not always happy with these services and in extreme cases can compel VPN providers to start logging internal connections to catch a perpetrator.

This is what appears to have happened to Seychelles-based VPN service Proxy.sh. Earlier this month the company excluded one of its nodes from its warrant canary.

“We would like to inform our users that we do not wish any longer to mention France 8 (85.236.153.236) in our warrant canary until further notice,” the company announced on its website, and via email to its customers.

Proxy.sh’s warning

proxycana

The warrant canary states that no warrants, searches or seizures of any kind have been received, but this is no longer true for the French node. The fact that this has been announced indirectly suggests that the company is not allowed to communicate about it publicly.

TorrentFreak reached out to Proxy.sh hoping to get some additional information. While no further details were provided, the VPN provider strongly advises its users not to connect to the ‘compromised’ node.

“We recommend our users to no longer connect to it. We are striving to do whatever it takes to include that node into our warrant canary again,” Proxy.sh says.

“The warrant canary has been particularly designed to make sure we could still move without being legally able to answer questions in a more detailed manner. We are happy to see it put to use after all and that our users are made aware of it,” they add.

The announcement will come as a shock to most Proxy.sh users and many will be wondering what they should do next. A good question, but unfortunately not one with an easy answer.

Leave or stay?

Some users may be inclined to leave. Why stay with a VPN provider that’s partly compromised if there are many other alternatives out there? This is a logical and understandable response.

On the other hand, one can also value Proxy.sh’s transparency in the matter. The company takes its warrant canary seriously where other VPN providers, with or without a warrant canary, may have stayed quiet.

Ironically, the fact that Proxy.sh received a gag order increases the trustworthiness of the company itself, although that comes at a price.

We suspect that there are only a few VPN providers that would suspend their operations “Lavabit style” on receipt of a narrowly targeted gag order that doesn’t compromise its service as a whole. Considering the fact that only one node is in question, the request does appear to be rather targeted in this case.

It’s also worth keeping in mind that many large Internet companies including Google and Facebook receive gag orders on a regular basis. Most users have no clue that this is happening, and others simply don’t care.

Trust?

VPN users who would prefer their VPN provider to shut down instead of complying with a gag order should leave, that much is clear. But how do you know that the next choice will be as transparent as Proxy.sh?

As is often the case it all boils down to trust. Do you trust your VPN provider to handle your private communications carefully, and to what degree does a gag order on one of the nodes change this?

How one answers this question is a matter of personal preference.

Most of our questions to Proxy.sh remained unanswered, presumably due to the court order, but the company was able to provide some additional details on their compliance with orders from various jurisdictions.

While the company is incorporated in the Seychelles, it also complies with orders from other jurisdictions it operates from.

“Our company respects the law everywhere it operates, but it still has the option to cooperate fully while ceasing any further operations in any specific jurisdiction,” Proxy.sh says.

“Depending on the level of threat to our users’ privacy and according to our legal advisers, we take the decision to bring updates to our warrant canary either for a specific node or for a whole country.”

So what would you do in this situation?

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Streaming Site Operators Face Jail & $1.7m Forfeiture

dimanche 26 juin 2016 à 10:23

Founded half a decade ago, Swefilmer was Sweden’s most popular unauthorized streaming site.

Offering all the latest movies and TV shows, Swefilmer (and another, Dreamfilm) captured up to 25% of all web TV viewing in Sweden according to a 2015 report.

Last summer, however, the noose began to tighten. In July local man Ola Johansson revealed that he’d been raided by the police under suspicion of being involved in running the site.

Meanwhile, police continued the hunt for the site’s primary operator and in March 2016 it was revealed that a Turkish national had been arrested in Germany on a secret European arrest warrant. The 25-year-old is said to be the person who received donations from users and set up Swefilmer’s deals with advertisers.

Both men have now been prosecuted by Swedish authorities. In an indictment filed in the Varberg District Court, both men are accused of copyright infringement connected to the unlawful distribution of more than 1,400 movies.

Additionally, the 25-year-old stands accused of aggravated money laundering offenses related to his handling of Swefilmer’s finances.

The prosecution says that the site generated more than $1.7m between November 2013 and June 2015. More than $1.5m of that amount came from advertising with user donations contributing around $110,000. The state wants the 25-year-old to forfeit the full amount. A $77,000 car and properties worth $233,000 have already been seized.

While both could be sent to prison, the 22-year-old faces less serious charges and will be expected to pay back around $3,600.

The trial, which is expected to go ahead in just over a week, will be the most significant case against a streaming portal in Sweden to date.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.