PROJET AUTOBLOG


TorrentFreak

Archivé

Site original : TorrentFreak

⇐ retour index

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week

lundi 2 septembre 2013 à 09:17

nowyouseemeThis week we have two newcomers in our chart.

Now You See Me is the most downloaded movie for the second week in a row.

The data for our weekly download chart is collected by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are BD/DVDrips unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

Week ending September 1, 2013
Ranking (last week) Movie IMDb Rating / Trailer
torrentfreak.com
1 (1) Now You See Me 7.4 / trailer
2 (3) We’re The Millers (Webrip) 7.2 / trailer
3 (2) Star Trek Into Darkness 8.1 / trailer
4 (…) Kick-Ass 2 (R6) 7.2 / trailer
5 (9) The Frozen Ground (Webrip) 6.4 / trailer
6 (7) Pain and Gain 6.7 / trailer
7 (4) Iron Man 3 7.5 / trailer
8 (5) The Conjuring 7.9 / trailer
9 (…) Breakout ?.? / trailer
10 (6) R.I.P.D (TS/Webrip) 5.5 / trailer

Source: Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week

The Copyright Monopoly Was Created As A Censorship Instrument – And Is Still Used As One

dimanche 1 septembre 2013 à 23:05

copyright-brandedWhen the printing press hit Europe, royalty and clergy panicked.

All of a sudden, they had lost the gatekeeper position of determining what culture and knowledge was available to the masses, and by extension, lost control of the political discourse of their time.

At the time, different regimes reacted differently to the threat. France reacted by banning book shops altogether and banning the use of the printing press under penalty of death. The ban was utterly ineffective. (Yes, you read that right: the penalty for unauthorized copying has been escalated as far as the death penalty, still without effect.)

On the other side of the British Channel, Mary I had inherited a Protestant England from her father, who had converted the entire country from Catholicism just in order to divorce her mother (and moved on to marry a half-dozen other women in sequence). Mary wasn’t very happy with the treatment of her mother and had been raised a Catholic; she saw it as her duty to convert England back to Catholicism, no matter the cost in blood.

She took the throne from her cousin in 1553 and started a crackdown on political dissidents that still to this day earns her the nickname “Bloody Mary”. In the time, there was no difference between political and religious dissent – it was a war of power, superficially over Catholicism or Protestantism. Over 280 dissenters were burned alive on Mary I’s orders as a warning to others.

In this environment, she sought a further means to suppress free speech and political dissent. Seeing how France’s death penalty against the printing press had failed miserably, she instead opted for an unholy alliance between capital and the crown. Mary I handed out a printing monopoly on May 4, 1557 to the London Company of Stationers. In return for a lucrative monopoly of printing everything in England, the company would agree to not print anything the Crown’s censors deemed politically insubordinate.

The scheme worked to suppress dissent and free thought, and censorship was successfully introduced. The monopoly was called copyright, the word from an internal registry with the London Company of Stationers. Thus, the unholy alliance of the copyright monopoly was forged in the blood of political dissent.

Mary I of England ultimately failed in her efforts to restore Catholicism, dying the following year and being succeeded by her protestant half-sister Elizabeth I. Her invention of censorship known as the copyright monopoly, however, survives to this day.

Still to this day, the copyright monopoly is used to prevent political dissent from being published. There are many examples, but the recent example of the oil company Neste Oil using the copyright monopoly to kill a Greenpeace protest against the oil company is one of the most telling and typical examples.

Unfortunately, there are hundreds and thousands more examples of how this monopoly remains in use as a political censorship tool.

About The Author

Rick Falkvinge is a regular columnist on TorrentFreak, sharing his thoughts every other week. He is the founder of the Swedish and first Pirate Party, a whisky aficionado, and a low-altitude motorcycle pilot. His blog at falkvinge.net focuses on information policy.

Book Falkvinge as speaker?

Source: The Copyright Monopoly Was Created As A Censorship Instrument – And Is Still Used As One

Kim Dotcom Prepares for Presidency of New Political Party

dimanche 1 septembre 2013 à 12:56

Subjected to police raids, the closure of his Megaupload empire and the confiscation of his considerable assets, things could hardly have been worse for Kim Dotcom in January 2012.

But now, just 20 months later, the Internet entrepreneur is showing what can be done with hard work and determination. His Mega.co.nz file-hosting service is doing well and his popularity continues to rise, both online and locally with New Zealanders.

With TV appearances now becoming a regular thing, Kiwis are becoming more and more comfortable with the German-born businessman. It therefore comes as no surprise that he intends to make best use of that valuable asset.

Earlier today Dotcom published a tweet suggesting that he plans to enter the political arena.

DotcomTweet

The photograph of the magazine suggests that Dotcom might become PM, but speaking with TorrentFreak today the Mega founder told us that at least for now, that won’t be possible.

“I’m not a citizen of New Zealand and therefore I can’t be elected into Parliament myself but I can be the president of a new party,” Dotcom explained.

So, with an eye on his presidency, work is already underway to form a brand new party.

“I have created a draft political program and I am in the early stages of meeting potential candidates to join me,” Dotcom added.

The elections being eyed take place in November 2014 and Dotcom told us that leaves plenty of time to get the party registered and the program finalized. He’s hoping to attract quality candidates during the new few months.

“I’m excited about the party and I’m confident that I can help make New Zealand a significant Internet economy player. Someone needs to lead New Zealand into the future. Unfortunately the current government doesn’t know what the future looks like,” Dotcom concludes.

Significant support for Dotcom in New Zealand will be an interesting thing to behold, particularly in light of the United States’ plans for the Megaupload founder. Definitely one to watch.

Source: Kim Dotcom Prepares for Presidency of New Political Party

Movie Piracy Hurts Health Research and Patient Care, UCSF Claims

samedi 31 août 2013 à 22:22

ucsfIn recent years US colleges and universities have undertaken drastic measures to reduce piracy, but none comes close to the “copyright awareness” campaign one of the top medical schools is currently running.

The University of California (UCSF) is alerting students and staff to the risks of online file-sharing and has lost all touch with reality in the process.

“Downloading content without paying for it is stealing. It’s no different than walking into a store, grabbing a movie and leaving without paying for it. The practice is stealing,” the campaign website reads, pointing people to an informational video and a newly launched poster campaign.

The posters, prominently featured in the UCSF shuttle buses and elsewhere at the university complex, stand out by making a quite unusual claim. Showing a $50,000 box office ticket, it warns that piracy “directly affects the funding for research, education and patient care.”

In other words, when you’re sharing copyrighted material without permission patient care deteriorates, while research and education funding dwindles.


ucsf-campaign1

UCSF provides no evidence or rationale for the absurd claim. To the best of our knowledge there is no direct link between piracy and any of the examples given.

The other educational campaign materials do, however, point out that the university is liable for the piracy habits of students and staff. While this isn’t directly true, since UCSF has safe harbor protections, this may be what the campaign is hinting at.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) agrees that the messaging used is inaccurate and misleading, to say the least.

“It’s disappointing to see one of the most respected medical schools in the country is distributing misleading, inaccurate propaganda from the entertainment industry,” EFF staff attorney Mitch Stoltz tells TorrentFreak.

“Saying that copyright infringement ‘directly affects the funding for research,education and patient care’ is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence – evidence that UCSF’s IT department does not have,” he adds.

Unfortunately, the misinformation and threats don’t stop there. In an anti-piracy campaign video on the effects of unauthorized file-sharing, several UCSF employees spread more FUD.

Bill Chartier, a UCSF desktop support technician, highlights some disastrous legal consequences and notes that he will completely wipe the computers of pirates who get caught.

“You can get fined, you can get sued by huge record companies, they have a lot of lawyers. You can get put in jail, and the university is also liable for whatever you do on your university computer.”

“If you’re a UC employee using a UC computer to do that I come and take your computer and wipe it completely, and get all the copywritten (sic) stuff off it,” Chartier adds.

Chartier’s threats are accompanied by a comment from the campaign manager, who suggests that using BitTorrent is considered a crime, ignoring the many legal uses.

“If you [...] use BitTorrent and you’re downloading music, you’re downloading movies, you’re downloading software for your personal use and you’re not paying for it, that’s considered pirating and that’s also considered a crime,” Hooman Moayyed, UCSF’s Security Awareness Program Manager says.

The EFF is baffled by this comment and suggests that the people behind the anti-piracy campaign are the ones who need to be educated.

“I guess no one told researchers at the National Institutes of Health, who use BitTorrent to share large biomedical data sets. I suspect students and faculty at UCSF could teach their IT department a few lessons about academic honesty.”

It’s unclear why the university is using these extremely misleading and inaccurate messages in their awareness campaign. While universities in the U.S. are required by law to deter piracy, they also have a moral obligation to do this truthfully.

We did notice that former Paramount Pictures CEO Sherry Lansing is on the UC board of regents. But that must be just a coincidence.

TorrentFreak contacted UCSF for a comment but we received no response.

Source: Movie Piracy Hurts Health Research and Patient Care, UCSF Claims

Ignoring DMCA Notices, BitTorrent Tracker Subjected to Attacks

samedi 31 août 2013 à 13:46

xwt2Putting together a private torrent site from scratch is not simply a case of pressing a few buttons to activate an automated script. All in it’s a task probably on par with renovating a house or completely rebuilding a car engine.

However, once the engine is running and the house is completed that’s usually more or less the end of the matter, but no such thing happens with a torrent site. There are always people who want to throw junk in the gearbox and tear down the walls.

Over the past few weeks TorrentFreak has been chatting with Xtreme Wrestling Torrents, a site dedicated to indexing wrestling shows and other fighting events. The site has been under attack in a number of different ways and the admin believes that anti-piracy groups are to blame. So what do these events look like from the inside?

DDoS attacks

The most recent batch of problems began during the first week of August when XWT was taken offline by a barrage of unwanted traffic.

“Our server was hit by a devastating DDoS attack, it crippled our entire network to the point that we were lucky to get an up to date backup from it,” the site’s admin told TorrentFreak.

“At one point there was literally nothing our host could do but to nullroute the server IPs. [The attack] took us down for almost four days, which is the longest downtime suffered for the site in its eight year existence.”

XWT Traffic

Almost two weeks later the attacks restarted but this time things were different. XWT had been forced to invest in DDoS protection and although costly, the decision paid off and the site stayed online.

But of course the big question is who was behind the attacks? XWT told TorrentFreak that the site’s datacenter managed to trace the attacks back to companies linked with a pair of sports organizations. However, in order for us to name the companies in question we would need to see logs of the attacks but since the datacenter wouldn’t hand them over, we’ve decided not to publish their names. That said, it’s beyond doubt that the attacks actually took place.

Cease and Desists and general threats

XWT showed us a selection of emails the site has received from outfits including wrestling company WWE. In the initial correspondence the company’s lawyer insists that the site should remove links and even delete user accounts of individuals uploading content. A follow-up email dated August 13 noted that XWT had “not geoblocked certain users from accessing your website” as previously requested.

However, WWE are not the only rightsholder interested in the site. A company called Ring of Honor Wrestling has hired Takedown Piracy (TDP) to put XWT under pressure. The email exchange between TDP’s Nate Glass and the XWT admin started in a standard way (professionally formatted “remove illegal torrents” style) but as can be seen from the quotes below, the conversation quickly got more heated.

dmcahaha“These torrents will NOT be removed,” responded the XWT admin, sparking the problems.

“So you know full well that this is copyrighted material of Ring of Honor and you are refusing to remove it?” Glass fired back.

What followed was XWT stating that torrent files are just meta links being hosted in a country where XWT believes they are legal. Following a pause, the XWT admin asks Glass why he isn’t going after the sites actually hosting the content.

Glass explains that he will do that and informs XWT that the conversations being held will be passed onto the lawyers of ROH, UFC and WWE. In response, XWT indicates that they aren’t too concerned.

“Collect your evidence, but I hope you have a name and address to attach to all of that,” XWT said.

“I have the name and address you list in your WHOIS,” Glass fired back. “Unless that information is false, which seems to be a cowardly move if you really feel that you are 100% legal, what would you have to hide by giving false information?”

Clearly going round in circles, it seems that targeting XWT’s revenue is an option.

Hitting a torrent site in its pocket by targeting payment processors

paypaldenied“So we’ll play the payment processor game again,” Glass said in another email. “I thought we had already [gone] through this and you stated you would remove [content] when we sent you a notice. So now you are going back on your word.”

According to XWT, Glass has been giving the site “a lot of trouble” over the past year and has reported the site to several payment processors.

“From Google Checkout, to PayPal, to 2Checkout, the list goes on and on,” XWT explain.

Anyone wanting to hear Takedown Piracy’s account of what’s been going on in their battle with XWT can do so here. It illustrates just how complex these matters can get.

Conclusion

Just to be absolutely clear, there is no suggestion whatsoever that Takedown Piracy were involved in any DDoS attack against XWT, or that all of the anti-piracy actions mentioned in this article are coordinated in any way. This is just an example of the kind of thing some torrent sites have to deal with when approached by an anti-piracy company being paid to make life difficult for them.

There will no doubt be people who feel that any kind of an attack on a site that refuses to comply with takedown notices is fair, while others will insist that the opposite is true, especially when a site is located in a jurisdiction where the DMCA does not apply.

Compromise of some sort seems like a preferable solution, but that’s something for the interested parties to decide.

Source: Ignoring DMCA Notices, BitTorrent Tracker Subjected to Attacks