PROJET AUTOBLOG


We Fight Censorship - L'info à l'abri de la censure

Archivé

source: We Fight Censorship - L'info à l'abri de la censure

⇐ retour index

India cannot stand media neutrality on Kashmir border disputes

vendredi 28 décembre 2012 à 16:14

In May 2011, the Indian customs forced The Economist to doctor 28,000 copies of its 21 May issue before permitting their distribution.

The problem was a cover story about the border dispute between India and Pakistan in Kashmir, one of the world’s most militarized regions. The report included a map showing the territory claimed by either side without taking a position on their territorial claims. The Indian authorities nonetheless insisted on a white sticker being placed over the map in each copy sold in India, depriving the country’s readers of a factual analysis of the border dispute.

L'article de The Economist censuré avec du sparadrap

Ever since the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947 and the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Kashmir’s border have been both a cause and symptom of the tension between India and its Pakistani and Chinese neighbours. Ever since the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947 and the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Kashmir’s border have been both a cause and symptom of the tension between India and its Pakistani and Chinese neighbours.

The Indian government often uses a 1961 law amending the criminal code’s national security provisions in order to censor maps showing Kashmir’s disputed border. It has usually settled for putting a “not recognized by India” sticker on the maps, but in recent years it has toughened its information control policies, going so far as to block the import and distribution of copies of the Financial Times and The Economist in December 2010 because they contained maps of Asia that were “not consistent” with the government’s position.

"We Fight Censorship" is reprinting the censored map with the kind permission of The Economist.

Carte des fronitères entre l'Inde et le Pakistan

Anticipating the censorship of the regional map in its 21 May 2011 issue, The Economist added a box entitled “Missing map?” at the end of report. The box said:

Sadly India censors maps that show the current effective border, insisting instead that only its full territorial claims be shown. It is more intolerant on this issue than either China or Pakistan. Indian readers will probably be deprived of the map on the second page of this special report. Unlike their government, we think our Indian readers can face political reality. Those who want to see an accurate depiction of the various territorial claims can do so using our interactive map at Economist.com/asianborders

Territorial disputes continue to be a highly sensitive subject for India’s government. When the Chinese foreign ministry issued new passports in November 2012 with a map of China on pages 8 and 46 showing territory claimed by Vietnam, Taiwan, Philippines and India as Chinese, all of these countries protested but India was the only one to respond by producing new visas for Chinese citizens with a map of India that showed its version of the Sino-Indian border dispute.

Kazakhstan : Zhanaozen – a city cut off from the rest of the world a year ago

vendredi 14 décembre 2012 à 13:16

A strike by oil workers snowballed a year ago in Zhanaozen, in western Kazakhstan, and ended up being crushed brutally by the security forces on 16 December 2011. The authorities skilfully imposed a news blackout on the event at the local, regional and national levels. Opposition media that tried to cover this highly sensitive story were subjected to growing harassment that culminated a year later with their being banned outright.

How a censored event was used as grounds for censorship

The video presented here was one of the first amateur videos of the events in Zhanaozen that circulated on social networks before being picked up by independent and opposition media. It clearly shows something that the authorities initially tried to cover up at all costs – the fact that the police fired live rounds at protesters and then beat the wounded as they lay on the ground. The National Security Committee (KNB) put a great deal of pressure on the media in an attempt to identify the authors of this and similar videos.

Evidence of this kind forced the authorities to recognize the use of disproportionate force and to punish the police officers responsible. But this has not stopped President Nursultan Nazarbayev’s autocratic government from blaming the violence on opposition parties and media and accusing them of deliberately trying to destabilize the country. The events in Zhanaozen ended up being used as grounds for an increased crackdown. National opposition media were closed in December 2012.

Means of communication selectively disconnected

Kazakhstan’s 20th independence anniversary celebrations were disrupted in Zhanaozen by oil workers who had been hounded and fired for going on strike. They occupied the city’s central square but were expelled in order to make way for the festivities. When police used live rounds to fire on a crowd of protesters, riots broke out and spread throughout the city. Most government buildings were set on fire.

The official toll was 15 dead and around 100 wounded. A demonstrator was killed the next day at the railway station in the nearby town of Shetpe as a detachment of special forces were passing through on their way to Zhanaozen. The Kazakh judicial system’s incomplete and biased investigations failed to explain exactly how the events unfolded.

Zhanaozen and the surrounding region were cut off from the world. For several days, the Internet and telecommunications were disconnected in a radius of about 65 km around the city – on the official grounds that cables had been damaged. Throughout the region, including its capital, Aktau, where tense demonstrations were held, it was impossible to send or receive SMS messages or access the Internet using a smartphone.

Twitter was blocked throughout the country on 16 December and was not restored until the following day. Several leading news websites such Guljan.org, the Russian citizen news agency Ridus.ru and the opposition newspaper Respublika’s news portal were also inaccessible.

From blocking to control of journalist

A 20-day state of emergency and curfew were declared in Zhanaozen. Checkpoints were established all around both Zhanaozen and Aktau. Journalists needed to obtain accreditation from the regional government in order to visit the region. The first journalists to go there were given a military escort. They described a deserted city patrolled by heavily-armed men. It was very hard in these circumstances to talk to residents, who were reluctant to talk for a long time.

The authorities loosened the restrictions on journalists a bit after several days but continued to monitor their movements closely. Russian journalists were held at a police station in Zhanaozen for several hours on 18 December while the contents of their computers, USB flash drives and audio recorders were carefully examined.  Considerable constraints were placed on the movements of Stan TV, Radio Azattyk, Associated Press and Al-Jazeera reporters by special forces the same day in Shetpe.

One year on – pluralism close to death

The government portrayed the events in Zhanaozen as a destabilization attempt orchestrated by the opposition, and quickly used this interpretation as grounds for gagging its critics. The leaders of several opposition parties were arrested and the head of the Alga party, Vladimir Kozlov, was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison and confiscation of all of his assets. Throughout 2012, reporters of independent and opposition media found themselves being arrested, summoned for questioning by the security services, physically attacked or the targets of intimidation attempts.

The escalation reached a tipping point on the first anniversary of the Zhanaozen unrest. Prosecutors in the capital Almaty brought “extremism” charges against the main opposition national news media. Within a few weeks, the Respublika and Vzglyad newspapers, the satellite TV station K+ and the Stan TV news agency had all been forced to suspend activities. The news website Guljan.org was suspended. What with rushed trials, convictions in absentia and violation of defence rights, the judicial system no longer even tries to maintain a semblance of respectability.

  1. Stan TV : mirror website http://stan.rsf.org/, download the full website
  2. K+ : mirror website http://kplus-tv.rsf.org/, download the full website
  3. Respublika : mirror website http://respublika-kz.rsf.org/, download the full website
  4. Vzglyad : mirror website http://vzglyad.rsf.org/,  download the full website

Radio silence on cholera epidemic?

mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 11:19

Calixto Ramón Martínez Arias, a journalist who works for Hablemos Press, a Havana-based independent information centre, was arrested on 16 September 2012 after writing about cholera and dengue epidemics in Cuba. Two months later, he managed to call Hablemos Press from Havana’s Combinado del Este prison, defying an order by the prison authorities forbidding him to use the phone. During the call, which Hablemos Press recorded, he talked about the degrading conditions inside the prison. After the call, the Hablemos Press phone line was temporarily disconnected and Martínez was placed in solitary confinement. But the Combinado del Este’s political prisoners have managed to keep the outside world informed about his plight.

WeFightCensorship is posting the articles that prompted Martínez’s arrest and  the recordings of the phone calls in which he and another detainee, Alexander Roberto Fernández Rico, described conditions in the prison.

The case began in June 2012, when eastern Cuba was hit by a cholera epidemic.  Even after two people had died of cholera and more than 50 had been hospitalized in the eastern city of Manzanillo, the authorities continued to say nothing on the subject although the public clearly needed to be informed.

Mosquito-borne dengue fever appeared in the eastern city of Camagüey in August. Four hundred people were initially hit but the number rose to 3,000 in the Camagüey alone in the space of a few weeks. The epidemic also spread to the rest of the country, infecting up to 90 people a day in Havana. Nonetheless, the authorities said nothing about the number of dead or infected.

Martínez was the first Cuban journalist to write about the cholera and dengue epidemics. His articles reported that health centres were overwhelmed, the authorities were saying nothing, diagnoses were being falsified in the records, and that officials from the Department for State Security (DSE) were everywhere, obstructing access to information.

He was arrested when he went to Havana’s José Martí international airport on 16 September to enquire about damage to a shipment of medicine that had been abandoned after being sent to Cuba by the World Health Organization. During his transfer to Santiago de las Vegas police station in the nearby municipality of Boyeros, the police hit Martínez repeatedly and he responded during the beating by cursing the Cuban regime. The police used this as grounds for detaining him on a charge of “disrespect” for Fidel and Raúl Castro.

Treated as a common criminal

On 10 November, Martínez was transferred to the Combinado del Este prison on the DSE’s orders. Once there, all of his personal effects were taken from him, he was denied the use of a phone, and he was forced to wear the uniform of a convicted common criminal. He began a hunger strike the same day to protest against the mistreatment and to demonstrate his refusal to be treated as a convict while in pre-trial detention.

Martínez managed to phone Hablemos Press three days later and in the ensuing conversation, the recording of which is posted immediately below, he gave the reasons for his hunger strike and described the conditions in the prison. After the call, the Hablemos Press phone line was temporarily disconnected, something that has been happening repeatedly since 23 September. The line goes down five or six times a day, each time for two or three hours. Hablemos Press director Roberto de Jesús Guerra Pérez’s mobile phone no longer works at all.

Martínez managed to call Hablemos Press again on 17 November, providing details of his physical condition after one week on hunger strike. He said he had a high fever and pains in his joints but was otherwise all right.

Support from fellow-inmates

There was no further news of Martínez until 21 November, when a political prisoner, Alexander Roberto Fernández Rico, managed to reach Hablemos Press. He said Martínez had been transferred the previous day to a punishment cell in “Area 47.” It also known as “Death Row” because, until 2005, inmates under sentence of death were held there pending execution. He said Martínez was naked in a cell on his own and was consuming just a litre of fetid water a day.

Hablemos Press managed to record this call, which is posted below. After the call, its line was disconnected for eight hours.

Fernández, who has been blind and paraplegic since a hunger strike in April 2012, was himself transferred to a punishment cell in Area 47 the next day. Another political prisoner, Ramón Alejandro Muñoz called Hablemos Press the same day and said: “They are cracking down hard on the Combinado del Este’s political prisoners, because we reported what happened to Martínez. Worse still, they are threatening to put other inmates in punishment cells if they don’t identify the political prisoners who are making the phone calls.”

Hablemos Press is waging an all-out campaign for Martínez’s release, circulating the recordings of the phone calls by email and urging NGOs to draw attention to the case.

Martínez has not been in a punishment cell since 6 December. He is continuing his hunger strike.

Calixto Ramón call on November 13th 2012

Les habla Calixto Ramón Martínez Arias, recluido en la prisión Combinado del Este, piso tercero sur, compañía 3309. Me encuentro aquí desde el sábado, día 10, y me abstengo de alimentarme debido a que se me quitó toda la ropa de civil que traía y a que se me había prohibido la comunicación telefónica.
 
Quiero decir que las condiciones de vida en esta prisión son pésimas, debe ser declarada inhabitable. Lo denuncio ante las organizaciones internacionales que velan por el respeto de los Derechos Humanos. Pido que visiten esta prisión, que hagan hincapié en visitar esta prisión debido a las pésimas condiciones, y que el gobierno cubano se llene de dignidad y declare esta prisión inhabitable. Debo denunciar el estado de hacinamiento que se está viviendo en esta prisión, pues en un espacio de 13 a 14 metros de largo por 6 de ancho conviven unos 36 reos.
 
El primer día que llegué aquí tuve que dormir en el piso por la sobrepoblación penal que hay. Un oficial me explicó que yo no era el único que dormía en el piso, que en casi todas las compañías había 1 o 2 reos durmiendo en el piso.
 
En estas compañías los presos han tenido que ingeniárselas porque la construcción es de losa doble T de fabricación rusa y tiene filtraciones. Los reos han tenido que colocar nailon, tipo canal, que desemboque en el baño para que el agua que gotee no caiga encima de su cama.
 
Son también pésimas las condiciones sanitarias, pues en este espacio de 13 o 14 metros de largo por 6 de ancho hay que contar que está el baño, que no tienen tazas sanitarias. Son dos  turcos, uno para orinar y otro para defecar, y un lavamanos doble.
 
Se vive en estrechez. Es una aglomeración de presos en un espacio reducido, muy pequeño, además del mal estado, la mala higiene y el mal aspecto con que se vive en estas pequeñas compañías.
 
En este momento ya tengo cama, dormí dos días en el piso; esta mañana me la cedieron. El primer día, como cosa de privilegio, quisieron bajarme a un piso que tenía una cama, pero simplemente para dormir, y por la mañana tenía que subir a la compañía a donde pertenecía, a estar tirado en el piso. Me negué rotunamente, no quiero privilegios para mi persona. Ahora me niego a comer, estoy reclamando que se me suba a aquí la ropa de civil, pues en ropa de preso no salgo a ningún lado.
 
Hasta que no me entreguen la ropa, no como. Me habían prohibido el teléfono, oí cuando el oficial de la Seguridad del Estado le  dijo a los de la prisión que yo tenía que estar distante del teléfono en todo momento. Pero hoy me colé entre los reos y logré venir acá.

Alexander Roberto Fernández Rico call on Novembre 22nd 2012.

Yo, Alexander Roberto Fernández Rico, recluido en Combinado del Este, en el edificio número 3, denuncio las arbitrariedades que se están cometiendo con el prisionero político Calixto Ramón. Por el motivo de la libre emisión de pensamiento, se encuentra Calixto Ramón en cautiverio, en estos momentos se encuentra en la celda de castigo. Calixto Ramón está reclamándole a la autoridad penitenciaria no llevar la ropa de recluso, como lo expresa el libro primero de procesamiento penal, que él es inocente hasta que no se pruebe lo contrario. En estos momentos, Calixto Ramón se encuentra en huelga de hambre, se encuentra en estos momentos dormitando en el suelo, porque todas las personas que se plantan en huelga de hambre, debido a las arbitrariedades que se cometen, que cometen las autoridades penitenciarias mandadas por la Dirección General de Cárceles y Prisiones (DGCP), donde quién dirige a las Cárceles y Prisiones de Cuba, se llama el General de Brigada Marcos Hernández Alcaraz, la Dirección General de Cárceles y Prisiones en Cuba se encuentra en la dirección de Quincica, ellos tienen conocimiento de estas torturas que están haciendo pasar a Calixto Ramón. En este momento Calixto Ramón se encuentra en huelga de hambre, repito, repito, se encuentra en huelga de hambre porque quieren que él use la ropa de recluso, cuando él se encuentra en estos momentos bajo prisión provisional, y está siendo torturado : le quitan la tabla, el colchón, las dos sábanas para taparse, toda su ropa, toda su ropa. Y, sólo le suministran un pomo de agua, en qué, este recipiente, es agua estancada, el recipiente mide 1,5 litros. Hasta el momento esto es todo lo que sabemos del hermano Calixto Ramón, este periodista independiente de la agencia de prensa Hablemos Press. 

You can help ! We need help us to translate the audio call transcriptions and the documents below to English or to any other language. Please, Contact us !

Morocco bans saying “close friend of the king”

jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 11:04
The Moroccan government withdrew its accreditation from Omar Brouksy, one of Agence France-Presse’s journalists in Rabat, on 4 October 2012. Issued by the communication ministry, this accreditation is what allows professional journalists to work in Morocco.

Why was it withdrawn? Because of an AFP report on partial elections in Tangiers that was headlined A crucial test for PJD leaves Moroccans indifferent The elections were organized after the Constitutional Council invalidated the previous elections in three Tangiers-Asilah seats and one Gueliz-Annakhil seat. The offending dispatch mentioned the PJD and the other parties participating in the elections, including the Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM) and its founder Fouad Ali El Himma, who was described as a friend of the king.

The government withdrew Brouksy’s accreditation on the same day as his dispatch. Brouksy learned of the decision from a dispatch published by the Moroccan press agency MAP. Headlined Government withdraws AFP journalist’s accreditation because of unprofessional dispatch, it quoted a government communiqué:

The AFP dispatch carried allegations implicating the monarchy in an election that took place in an atmosphere of transparency, thereby undermining the monarchy’s position of neutrality and its role as arbiter keeping a distance from all electoral competitions between political parties.

The story does not end there. The next day AFP news director Philippe Massonet voiced his support for Brouksy. An AFP dispatch headlined Moroccan authorities withdraw AFP reporter’s accreditation quoted Massonet as saying:

The offending report’s sole aim was to inform and put a situation in context, with no intention of causing prejudice to anyone at all. The AFP bureau in Rabat continued to enjoy the full confidence of the news agency’s management, Massonet added.

But Brouksy still has no accreditation.

Sending encrypted emails using Thunderbird and PGP

mardi 27 novembre 2012 à 11:56
Online Survival Kit
More than 200 billion e-mails are sent worldwide every day. Although it is a very practical tool for exchanging information, it is also vulnerable and users can encounter problems such as interception, identity theft and monitoring. Yet there are easy ways to ensure your Internet activities remain confidential.

Use an email client, not webmail

One way of enhancing the confidentiality of your email is to use an application to send and receive email, such as Thunderbird.

One of the most important security factors when you send emails is the method you use to log into your email provider. Thunderbird allows you to control how you log in. Whenever possible, you should use an SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) or TLS (Transport Layer Security) connection. These protocols protect your email password from possible interception by any third-party software installed on your system or at any point between Thunderbird and your email server.

How to configure Thunderbird

Thunderbird is free software. You can download it free of charge from the Mozilla project website. Once you have installed it, you need to configure it to connect to your email provider. Don’t worry, Thunderbird does most of this by itself. 

 

When you launch Thunderbird for the first time, a wizard helps you configure the link between your account and the email client. If you already have an email address, when the assistant is launched choose “Skip this and use my existing email”. All you need to know is your email address, username and password. Enter these on the next page. Thunderbird retrieves the data from the mail server. The software automatically configures the most widely used email address such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail. The screenshot below shows an example of a Gmail address.

However, if your address is not in the Thunderbird email database, you will have to configure your account manually. In that case you will need:

  • your email address
  • your username
  • your password
  • the name and the protocol of the receiving server (for example IMAP will be imap.example.com and POP will be pop.example.com)
  • the name of the outgoing mail server (smtp.example.com)

You can find this information in the help pages of your email provider

To see for yourself whether Thunderbird uses SSL or TLS, go to Tools->Account settings>Server settings and check the section “Security settings”.

Using Thunderbird and the TSS or SSL protocol only protects the connection between your computer and the email server. They do not ensure the security of your exchanges with a third party. Your emails may be intercepted at various points between the server and the recipient’s computer. To remedy this, it is possible to encrypt one’s emails end-to-end by using the protocol PGP (pretty good privacy). 

How to encrypt email using PGP

Cryptography, from the Greek for “hidden writing”, is the main technique used to ensure effective confidentiality of electronic communications.

PGP is the protocol that we shall use to encrypt our emails end-to-end. Its use excludes any possibility of interception. Your emails are encrypted from start to finish and only the addressee is able to decrypt it. Note that the “subject” line and the other header fields of a PGP-encrypted email are not encrypted.

Beware: Encryption attracts attention.

 

Sending encrypted emails can sound the alarm for the authorities and may lead to unwanted attention. There is another way of sending email securely and anonymously: disposable email addressing.

In order to understand how to implement PGP in Thunderbird, it is important first of all to cast an eye over the principle of asymmetric encryption on which PGP is based.

Classic encryption

Ann and Michael want to exchange secret messages, so they agree on an encryption and decryption code and a key. Then they exchange messages using them. The snag with this method is that if a third person intercepts the messages in which Ann and Michael exchange their key, that person can see it and use it, perhaps to send bogus e-mails to Ann and Michael. So Ann and Michael have to exchange their key when nobody else can see it, by meeting in person, for example. 

Asymmetric encryption

The best way to fix the problem is to use “asymmetric” encryption. Two keys are needed
for this, one to encrypt, the other to decrypt. Details of the encrypting key (the “public
key”) can be exchanged without risk over the Internet because it can’t be used to decrypt messages. The decrypting key (the “secret key”) must never be communicated.

With asymmetric encryption, Ann has her own pair of keys (a public key that she gives out and a secret one that she keeps). Ann sends her key to Michael, who uses it to encrypt his messages to her. Only Ann, with her secret key, can then decrypt Michael’s messages. Michael, with his own pair of keys, in turn sends his public key to Ann, who can then reply to his messages in complete privacy.

But since the public key is exchanged over the Internet without special protection, it’s best to check its validity with its owner. Each key has a “fingerprint” (a short string of characters), which it’s easy to communicate in person or over the phone.

An unverified key may be a false one issued by a third person with evil intent, making the encryption totally useless. The reliability of asymmetric encryption depends entirely on protecting the secret key and checking the public key of the other person. OpenPGP (Open Pretty Good Privacy) is the standard asymmetric encryption. The most popular software to generate and use a pair of keys and manage the public keys of its correspondents is GnuPG (GNU Privacy Guard), which can be used with email clients as well as Macs, Windows and Linux.

Using PGP with Thunderbird

How to install PGP on Windows

To be able to send encrypted emails, there are three things you need:

  1. Software that allows you to generate your secret key and the manage the public keys of your contacts: gpg4win
  2. An email client installed on your computer: Thunderbird 
  3. A plug-in that allows the encryption of emails: enigmail

After downloading and installing gpg4win, install the enigmail plug-in for Thunderbird.

  1. Got to the Thunderbird menu Tools->Add-ons, which opens the plug-ins window.
  2. Write “Enigmail” in the search window and click the search button.
  3. Click the “install” button.
  4. Once installation is completed, relaunch Thunderbird.

How to install PGP on Mac OS X

To install PGP on a Mac, all you need to do is download the suite of free and open source tools at GPGtools. These include all the necessary tools for using PGP on Mac OS X.

Generate a PGP key

To encrypt your emails using PGP, you need to generate a public key and a private key. This is done easily in Thunderbird by following the steps suggested by the PGP key wizard. To launch it, choose OpenPGP->Setup wizard.

 

Once the wizard has been launched, follow the instructions, choosing the default options:

Signing: “Yes, I want to sign all of my email” – you will authenticate all the emails you send using your private key.


Encryption: “No, I will create per-recipient rules or those that sent me their public key” – not all the emails you send will be encrypted, i.e. you decide whose messages you will encrypt.

Preferences: “Yes” – you authorize the wizard to make changes to the default formatting of you emails, which should be in plain text in order to be compatible with PGP.

Open PGP key not found: If you have no PGP key, this screen shows you how to generate one.

Creating a key: To prevent your secret key being used by anyone else, the wizard suggests you protect it with a password. Enter a password in both fields. Using fast words is good method of creating secure passwords.

Everything is ready. To launch the creation of your PGP key, click “next”.

Optional: You can create a revocation certificate. This will allow you to disable your key if you lose it. Keep it somewhere safe on your hard disk

Note: If the wizard ask for the path to the GnuPG application, this was installed at the same time as GPG4win and is on your disk in Program Files (x86) > GNU > GnuPG > gpg2.exe.

The creation of your PGP is complete and you can now sent encrypted emails, so long as you have the recipients’ public keys.

Sending an encrypted message

In Thunderbird, click the “write” button, which opens a message window. At the bottom right there are two symbols, a pencil and a key.

These allow you to sign or encrypt a message. Click on the key, which will turn yellow, and write your message. 

If you click on “send” and you have not retrieved the addressee’s public key, Thunderbird will suggest downloading if for you. In the screen below, click on 
“Download missing keys”.

A window appears showing a choice of servers that host public keys.

Thunderbird suggests standard directories of the most commonly used public keys. Choose one of the servers and click OK. If the addressee has published his key in one of the suggested directories, you should be able to retrieve it easily.

Click OK to download the key.

 

Once it is completed, the result is shown in a window. Close this window. The addressee’s key will now appear in the list offered by the application. Choose it and click OK.

If you have protected your own key with a password (which you should have done if you have generated a key following this tutorial), Thunderbird will ask you to enter your password to encrypt the message using your secret key. Enter the password and click OK.

The message has been sent.

There are other methods for importing addressees’ public keys. For example they could send it to you by email and provide you with the fingerprint. The fingerprint is a unique number that allows you to identify a public key. By verifying a key’s fingerprint you can ensure you are sending the message to the intended recipient.

For more information on using PGP and key management, see the Enigmail handbook.