It turns out that the London thug recently convicted of raping and murdering a woman was accused, six years ago, of driving a car while wearing nothing below the waste. If he did so, does that matter?

As far as I can see, lack of pants while driving has no significance at all. People a few feet away form the car generally cannot see the absence of pants. To call this "exposure" is exaggeration of the facts.

His misogynist communications may well be connected with his crime, but let's be careful not to demonize every unusual thing he did in connection with sex. You can't tell that someone will rape or murder based on quirks, and we risk oppressing people if we suppose you can.